Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Swine unto the Nations

Israeli settlers release wild pigs on Palestinian farms

IMEMC 21 Apr by Chris Carlson — Palestinian farmers in the Salfit district appealed all to Palestinian and international bodies to stop the continued destruction of their crops caused by the Israeli pigs [wild boars] in the district. Farmers said, “We have encountered heavy losses in our wheat and barley crops, where the pigs destroyed them completely.” They added, “We tried to get rid of the pigs with all available ways but we have failed,” pointing out that the only way is to shoot them; which is difficult due to the miltary’s monitoring towers and checkpoints in the area. Furthermore, according to Al Ray, Palestinian researcher Khaled Maali explained that the settlers found launching wild pigs toward the Palestinian farmlands was the best effective way to fight the Palestinian farmers without significant cost. Maali pointed out that the occupation prevents the Palestinians from shooting the pigs, whereas it permits settlers to kill the pigs when they reach their colonial settlements.

Also see:

A Sewer Unto the Nations: Israeli 'settlers' pump sewage on to Palestinian farm land

Saturday, April 19, 2014

The Religion of Orthodox Judaism Exonerates the Romans, Claims Full Responsibility for the Execution of Jesus

On Passover Eve they hanged Jesus of Nazareth. And the herald went out before him for forty days: 'Jesus of Nazareth is going out to be stoned because he practiced sorcery, incited [to idol worship] and led Israel astray. Whoever knows an argument in his favor should come and argue on his behalf.' But they did not find an argument in his favor, and they hanged him on Passover Eve ... Jesus ... had close connections with the non-Jewish authorities, and those authorities were interested in his acquittal. Thus it was necessary to give him all the opportunity to clear himself, so that the justice of his conviction not be challenged ... Was Jesus of Nazareth deserving of a search for an argument in his favor? He was an inciter, and the Torah (lit., "the Merciful") says: "You shall not spare, nor shall you conceal him"! (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 43a, Steinsaltz edition, Vol XVII, Part III)

... the Talmud is here offering a subtle commentary upon Jesus' political connections. The Gospels portray the Roman governor Pontius Pilate as going to great lengths to spare Jesus (Mark 15: 6-15) … the Talmudic passage points in the same direction ...

... the passage suggests rabbinic willingness to take responsibility for the execution of Jesus. No effort is made to pin his death upon the Romans. In all likelihood, the passage in question emanates from fourth-century Babylon, then the center of Talmudic scholarship, and beyond the reach of both Rome and Christianity. Although several hundred years had elapsed since the lifetime of Jesus, and therefore this is not at all a contemporary source, the Talmudic passage indicates rabbinic willingness to acknowledge, at least in principle, that in a Jewish court and in a Jewish land, a real-life Jesus would indeed have been executed ... ("Jesus in the Talmud," Steven Bayme, American Jewish Committee National Director, September 24, 2003)


The very fact that the Talmud's claim of Jesus' closeness to the Roman government reflects some knowledge ... of the New Testament narrative, particularly of of John's version of it ... this detail exonerates the Roman government from the blame of Jesus' condemnation and consequently, adopting the Gospels' message, puts the thrust of the accusation on the Jews ... What we then have here in the [Babylonian Talmud] is a powerful confirmation of the New Testament Passion narrative, a creative rereading, however, that not only knows some of its distinct details but proudly proclaims Jewish responsibility of Jesus' execution. (Jesus in the Talmud, Peter Schafer, Princeton University Press, pp.73-74)

Also see:

The Crucifixion Narrative for Goys vs. the Crucifixion Narrative Which the Rabbis Maintain Amongst Themselves

The Judaic Propensity to Have It Both Ways

Bad Advice From the Pope

"We Killed Jesus, And We'll Kill You Too"

Francis and His Brother Pharisees Joke about "the last lunch"

Please see:

The Last Lunch

Friday, April 18, 2014

Victimization of "Jews" takes center stage on Good Friday

Bill O’Reilly’s Midrash on Jesus

PDF File 
Bill O’Reilly’s Midrash on Jesus 

by Michael Hoffman. 19 pages. 7,000 words. $5.50

Michael Hoffman’s Notes on 
O’Reilly's The Last Days of Jesus: His Life and Times 
A Special Illustrated Edition of Killing Jesus

 "The modern world conspires to qualify, modify and mitigate, like a shyster lawyer, the guilt of the founders of the religion of rabbinic Judaism for the death of the Son of God. In Bill O’Reilly, as evidenced by this subversive and disgraceful book, Judaism has found another such shyster.” — Michael Hoffman 

Hoffman analyzes the flaws in The Last Days of Jesus, in the course of which he demolishes many of the standard propaganda ploys of all those who attempt to shift the blame for the Crucifixion of Christ from the Pharisees, Scribes and Sadducees on to the Romans and Pontius Pilate.

Order the PDF file of Michael Hoffman's essay, "Bill O’Reilly’s Midrash on Jesus," here:

Monday, April 14, 2014

Leaven-burning Brooklyn Rebbe Calls NYC Firemen "Nazis"

Video: Sanz-Klausenberg Rebbe Equates NYC Firemen With Nazis

It is the tradition of Orthodox Judaism to meticulously clean all leaven from the home and burn it in the hopes that so doing will make 'The Jews' worthy that their "Messiah' will smash 'Esau'(Christiandom). It's become customary in recent times for the popes and bishops to send these anti-Christ, racial supremacist, hate-religion adherents warm greetings on their hate holiday of rabbinic Passover.

Please see:

This Evening the "Elder Brothers" Cleanse their Homes of Leaven, Hopeful for our Annihilation

The Passover Cover Story For Goys vs. The Real Deal

Benedict Meets in Cabal with the Pharisees for their Pharisaic Passover

Observations on Benedict XVI's Passover Eve Synagogue Visit

Benedict Wants the World to be Conscious of the Symbolic Significance of his Passover Eve Synagogue Visit

Man with history as federal government informant jailed in fatal shooting of 3 Christians in claimed 'anti-Jewish Hate Crime'

Friday, April 11, 2014

Bp. Williamson and The Midrash "of the Man God"

"… if I had a family to defend: [I would read] aloud each night to the children selected chapters from Maria Valtorta’s Poem of the Man-God. And when we had reached the end of the five volumes in English, I imagine us starting again from the beginning, and so on, until all the children had left home!" (Bp. Williamson, Eleison Comments  CCLXXV (275) 20 October 2012. HOME READING)

I've been asked to collate research I've done on the 'Catholic' Midrash titled The Poem of the Man God allegedly written by a woman named Maria Valtorta which is heavily promoted by Bp. Williamson. Most of this was posted at a traditionalist forum which was taken offline making it inaccessible. Below are some comments based upon that research which I posted at another traditionalist forum which doesn't include all my objections, most notably that "the Poem" depicts a Mary who reasons that she should be "a big sinner" so that she could repent later. This is barely veiled Lurianic theology which one might expect to find in a Frankist sect.

Below starts my comments and some dialogue which came in response to one of Bp. Williamson's published recommendations for children to be read The Poem of the Man God :


Below is a link to a recording of a talk given by Fr. Robinson (SSPX) promoting "The Poem." What interested me most is that Fr. Robinson says that his initial reaction to "The Poem" was negative but that Bp. Williamson insisted that he continue reading it.

Sadly, he states that Bp. Williamson stakes his theological reputation on "The Poem" being free from error. He says that Bp. Williamson has stated he would ordain any man to the priesthood who reads "The Poem" because he believes it contains an entire seminary curriculum within it (something I find unsettling in light of Bp. Williamson's recent statement about making his bishop's powers available "to anyone who will use them wisely").

Fr. Robinson has said that he has looked at every objection to "The Poem" but he nor any of "the Poem's" apologists have answered to its outrageous depiction of Christ venerating the Pharisee and father of rabbinic Judaism, Hillel; just as The Angelus administration never answered for the similar outrage in "Saint of the Sanhedrin."


This is where Bp. Williamson sadly walks in lockstep with the "Saint of the Sanhedrin" agenda.

"The Poem" or more accurately, the Midrash "of the Man-God," like "The Saint of the Sanhedrin" extols the virtue of the Pharisee Hillel, outrageously putting Jesus on his knees venerating Hillel's grave, among many other absurdities.

Quote "Jesus" as depicted in The Poem of the Man God:
"I love and venerate Hillel, I respect and honour Gamaliel. They are two men through whose justice and wisdom the origin of man is revealed"

Who in their right mind cannot see the pharisaic/rabbinic hand behind this outrageous Pharisee-veneration put in the mouth of Christ?

There is no justice in the Pharisee Hillel. A book that claims that Jesus venerated the Pharisee Hillel who overruled God's law on divorce and allowed divorce for any reason; who nullified God's 7 year release of debts and created loopholes for incest by defining it as "not sex" is absolutely, 100% certainly not from God.

"The Poem" was shepherded past Cardinal Ottaviani and the Holy Office by Cardinal Bea of unhappy memory whose treachery reached its zenith with the shepherding of Nostra Aetate through Vatican II.

At least Bp. Williamson admits that he recommends this Pharisee-venerating tome against the will of Archbishop Lefebvre although he minimizes the Archbishop's objections to it, and the objections of others.

To understand why it's impossible that Jesus would venerate the creature Hillel for "justice and wisdom" we look at Mark 10;2-10 and Matthew 19;3-9 in which the Pharisees attempt to ensnare Jesus on the topic of divorce.

Judaic and Christian scholarship of any given era largely takes for granted that Jesus is being confronted with the pharisaic positions of Hillel and Shammai in this passage. The Gospel passage makes it clear that Jesus condemns both the positions of Hillel and Shammai, corrects the injustices of both positions and teaches what God intends on the indissolubility of marriage.

The 1917 Catholic Encyclopedia identifies Hillel and his "lax" teaching on divorce with the Gospel narrative of the Pharisaic attempted ensnarement of Jesus on that topic:

In the time of Christ there was an acute controversy between the recent, lax school of Hillel and the strict, conservative school of Schammai about the meaning of the Hebrew phrase ["for some uncleanness"]. Hence the question with which the Pharisees tempted Our Lord: "Is it lawful [for a man to put away his wife] for every cause?" The putting-away of the wife for frivolous reasons had been sharply condemned by God through the Prophets Micheas (ii, 9) and Malachias (ii, 14), but in later days it became very prevalent. (Catholic Encyclopedia, "Divorce")


We know from the Gospel that Jesus condemned Hillel's unjust teaching on divorce. We know with absolute certainty that the Gospel is of God. If the law of non-contradiction has any bearing on the matter, the Midrash "of the Man-God" which outrageously depicts Jesus venerating the creature Hillel for his "justice and wisdom" cannot be of God.

It may interest people to know that the shepherd of the Midrash "of the Man God," Augustin Bea wrote the draft for the encyclical Divino Afflante Spiritu which opened the Bible to textual and historical criticism within the Church. This same Augustin Bea abused every means to assure that the error-strewn Midrash "of the Man God" suffered no criticism at all.

Single-issue traditionalists who don't care about Augustine Bea's shepherding of the Midrash "of the Man God" past any criticism or his shepherding of Nostra Aetate through Vatican II or his shepherding of textual and historical criticism of Scripture into the Church may be interested to know of his role in shepherding the Novus Ordo Mass into Catholic parishes. Augustin Bea, along with Annibale Bugnini and others, was a member of the secretive Commission for Liturgical Reform from its very beginning in 1948. As we know, the first target of attack was the Holy Week liturgy.

There is a clear trajectory to his treachery for anyone with eyes to see. The Judaizing "Poem of the Man God" is very much in alignment with it.

Telesphorus said:
It will be very good to have Bishop Williamson in the resistance.

We can only pray that Bishops Tissier and Alphonso will join it, so that there is no question as to which side is carrying the legacy of the Archbishop.

Catholic Tradition needs new leaders, new consecrations.

With the children being led to believe that Jesus venerated Hillel, among too many other absurdities to list, there will be no resistance worth speaking of.

Telesphorus said:

How could a just man argue that a husband could put his away wife for spoiling supper, as the Pharisee Hillel taught?

It is maddening that the modernists have tried to cast Our Lord as a follower of Hillel.  And worse that the ignorant or insane editors of the Angelus would attempt to place him between Isaiah and John the Baptist.  Hillel does not appear in Holy Writ.  Hillel is not a figure in salvation history.  St. Paul asserted plainly that his pharisaic training was useless.

Indeed. And how can Bp. Williamson not only promote a work that goes far beyond "Saint of the Sanhedrin" in its outrages and claim that this work is of God?

This is far, far worse than The Angelus article which does not go so far as to make Jesus venerate Hillel or claim an imprimatur from heaven.

Seraphim said:

  But again, someone reading your great posts could be led to believe that you are accusing Bishop Williamson of Judaizing, whereas I think he is really just (imprudently) recommending a book for other literary qualities.


The Bp. makes no such distinction. He claims it is from God. Children subjected to "the Poem" are unable to distinguish between the 'literary qualities' of the work and the errors it contains.

I don't know what the Bp.'s intention is here. I know that this work he recommends to the children of the resistance is part of the attack.

"Neil Obstat," the misunderstanding is on your part. I'm referencing not only this most recent endorsement of "The Poem" from Bp. Williamson but all of the countless endorsements of this Midrash that he's made throughout his entire ministry, most of which go much farther than this most recent Eleison Comments.

Bp. Williamson has gone so far as to say that he stakes his theological reputation on "The Poem of the Man God" being entirely free of error. He has said explicitly in another Eleison Comments (CCI May 21, 2001, "Two Repentances") that he believes "The Poem" is from God.

Nadir said:
Those who were giving it high praise, even adulation, at the time were saying things like "but it fills in the gaps" (in Holy Scripture). What gaps did God leave in His book?

What's wrong with reading the Holy Bible as a family? Beats me!

I can only agree. The con-man Augustin Bea sold us something we not only don't need, but is damaging to us.

The rabbinic heirs of Hillel have been rendering their followers completely alien to Scripture for 2000 years with their Midrash, which purports to "fill in the blanks."

The shepherd of "The Poem of the Man God" Cardinal Augustin Bea with Vatican II co-conspirator Rabbi Abraham Heschel who said of Christians, "I want to attack their souls."

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

The Fruits of Francis' 'Merciful' Moral Indifference

Pope Francis feeds the remaining scraps of the Catholic flock not already devoured by the Pharisees to their morally degenerate golems.

Furor at Catholic high school after nun presents Church teaching on homosexuality

This is the fruit of ADL produced Catholic teaching material.

These commissars of the multicultural 'tolerance' fraud will not protect the moral minority, God will, however.

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Alan Shatter Opponents, Stay on Point

The comment below was censored by http://www.independent.ie

A lot can and should be said about the fact that they find a suggestion that protest should be non-violent and point-based too dangerous to publish.

Opponents of Alan Shatter's immigration policy should avoid slurs and pranks and stay on point. Emphasize the fact that he would never advocate the same immigration policy for 'Israel' that he imposes upon Ireland. Emphasize the fact that Shatter will not criticize 'Israel's' racist immigration policy and marriage laws, its sending asylum seekers back to Rwanda, its horrific treatment of all non-Jews, etc. Criticize his unequivocal, hypocritical support for a culturally and ethnically 'pure' 'Jewish' state while acting with complete disregard for the cultural and ethnic makeup of Ireland. Press him with the question, why no multicultural agenda for 'Israel,' Alan Shatter? If this multiculturalism would be such an economic boon for Ireland then why not for 'Israel' also?

Do this without hatred or violence, but firmly with the conviction that the Irish are more entitled to maintain their cultural and ethnic makeup on the land they've inhabited for thousands of years than the Zionists dragging their stolen culture to stolen land in the Middle East who Alan Shatter identifies with and defends more than the country he's supposed to serve.

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Without an 'existential' threat Counterfeit Israel would collapse in one month

This is not an 'apartheid wall' surrounding a 'European colonial expansionist project.' It's a Judaic ghetto wall surrounding a Judaic ghetto.

Very few of the 'secular,' 'Communist' 'Jews' who founded the nation they call 'Israel' were removed from the rabbinic ghettos and shtetls of Europe (which were imposed upon them by the rabbis, with the cooperation of Christian nobility) by even a generation. Counterfeit Israel and its ghetto wall are direct manifestations of the protection racket of rabbinic Judaism. Without real or imaginary 'existential' threats Judaism and its direct, ideological descendant, Zionism fall apart.

Excised from: "The crisis that Israel adroitly manufactured," Kourosh Ziabari, April 2, 2014

The representative of the Jewish minority in Iran’s parliament (Majlis) has recently given an extensive interview to one of Iranian news agencies and discussed his different viewpoints regarding the Israeli regime and the way the Jewish community of Iran see the state that proclaims to be representing the global Jewry.

According to Siamak Mareh Sedq who has talked to the Fars News Agency, Tel Aviv needs to create crisis in the Middle East in order to survive. “If Israel faces no threat it will be destroyed within one month. Israel needs (regional) crises in a bid to continue its existence,” he said.

This wise and precise analysis is exactly what the audacious commentators, intellectuals and journalists in the West who dare to criticize the policies and practices of the Israeli regime without fear of losing their jobs or being vilified as “anti-Semites” agree on. This is something that even the Israelis know well and confess to. An anonymous Israeli official once had privately told the president of the National Iranian American Council Trita Parsi, “You have to recognize that we Israelis need an existential threat. It is part of the way we view the world. If we can find more than one, that would be preferable, but we will settle for one.”

The fact that Israel needs a serious existential threat to secure its survival and depends on regional crises to make sure that its existence will not be undermined and can go ahead with its colonial, expansionistic projects and ambitions is no closed book to anyone studying the history of this regime.

Mormons are 'Noahides'

Observant Mormons certainly fall into the category of Bnei Noach, and can relate in a religious way to the respect and reverence that observant Jews have for this great prophet [Noah]. ("Why Russell Crowe Should Play a Mormon Noah," Mormon 'Bishop' Mark Paredes, Jewish Journal, March 31, 2014)

Joseph Smith, founder of Mormonism, was a Freemason who was killed by porch Masons who were angered by his coopting and revising masonic ritual and tradition for his new religion. The rabbis have little to dislike about 'Noahide' Mormonism.

Second Anti-Catholic 'Price Tag' Attack in Counterfeit Israel This Week

Don't let anyone tell you this is hooliganism. This (and much, much worse) is the method of terror that Khazar fanatics used to drive native Palestinian Christians and Muslims off their land so that Counterfeit Israel could be propped up there. The religious ideology-fueled terrorist savagery has been ongoing since.

Large-Scale Anti-Christian Price Tag Attack In Northen Israel

Shmarya Rosenberg • FailedMessiah.com

The tires of 40 vehicles were slashed and a wall was spray painted with a message reading “only goyim should be evacuated from our land" Wednesday night or early Thursday morning in Jish, a small Arab village with about 3,000 residents located near Sefat in the Upper Galilee, Ynet reported.

Police reportedly believe the incident is another in a long line of price tag attacks believed to be carried out by Jewish West Bank settler youth and their supporters, almost all of whom are Zionist Orthodox or haredi-Zionist Orthodox.

Jish is the only village in Israel with a majority Maronite-Catholic population. Only one third of Jish’s residents are Muslim …

Earlier this week, anti-American and anti-Christian graffiti – including "America is Nazi Germany,” "price tag,” “Jesus is a monkey,” and “Mary is a cow” – was spray-painted on the Deir Rafat Monastery near Beit Shemesh and the tires of three cars and a truck were slashed.

Last week another price tag attack took place in East Jerusalem. The tires of 34 cars and a bus were slashed, and all the vehicles were spray-painted with "goyim in Israel = enemies.”

No arrests in any of these attacks have been made.

But that is not unusual.

In the many price tag attacks that have taken place over the past several years – including quite a few involving arson and attempted arson – almost no arrests have been made and, despite claims to the contrary, police do not appear to consider apprehending the attackers a high priority.

Full article:


Thursday, April 3, 2014

Francis' Incorrect Diagnosis and Poisonous Prescription

http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com writes:

Bergoglio's pre-conclave remarks

The archbishop of Havana, Cardinal Jaime Lucas Ortega y Alamino was so impressed with the remarks Jorge Mario Bergoglio made before the conclave he asked him for a copy of them. Bergoglio gave Ortega a copy of his outline and soon after the conclave Francis gave Ortega permission to share this document publicly. The unofficial translation below is from Radio Vatican, Bergoglio's Intervention: A diagnosis of the problems in the Church. The original story was broken by the official magazine of the diocese of Havana, Palabra Nueva, Manuscrito entregado por el Cardenal Bergoglio al Cardenal Ortega. Images of the handwritten notes are from Palabra Nueva, Imagen del manuscrito entregado por el Cardenal Bergoglio al Cardenal Ortega.

Evangelizing implies Apostolic Zeal

1. - Evangelizing pre-supposes a desire in the Church to come out of herself. The Church is called to come out of herself and to go to the peripheries, not only geographically, but also the existential peripheries: the mystery of sin, of pain, of injustice, of ignorance and indifference to religion, of intellectual currents, and of all misery.

2. - When the Church does not come out of herself to evangelize, she becomes self-referential and then gets sick. (cf. The deformed woman of the Gospel). The evils that, over time, happen in ecclesial institutions have their root in self-referentiality and a kind of theological narcissism. In Revelation, Jesus says that he is at the door and knocks. Obviously, the text refers to his knocking from the outside in order to enter but I think about the times in which Jesus knocks from within so that we will let him come out. The self-referential Church keeps Jesus Christ within herself and does not let him out.

3. - When the Church is self-referential, inadvertently, she believes she has her own light; she ceases to be the mysterium lunae and gives way to that very serious evil, spiritual worldliness (which according to De Lubac, is the worst evil that can befall the Church). It lives to give glory only to one another.

Put simply, there are two images of the Church: Church which evangelizes and comes out of herself, the Dei Verbum religiose audiens et fidente proclamans; and the worldly Church, living within herself, of herself, for herself. This should shed light on the possible changes and reforms which must be done for the salvation of souls.

4. - Thinking of the next Pope: He must be a man who, from the contemplation and adoration of Jesus Christ, helps the Church to go out to the existential peripheries, that helps her to be the fruitful mother, who gains life from “the sweet and comforting joy of evangelizing.”


It would be a mistake for any traditionalist to conclude from these jottings that Francis intends only to cut the Church off from its mooring by his attack on self-referentiality (i.e. reference to the Church's foundational texts and teachings). No, based upon the evidence, Francis' 'madness' has a very clear, traceable trajectory. The intent is certainly not to let the Church blow any which way, but rather, to tie it to a counterfeit mooring.

Pope Francis' euphemistic language above has been translated to English. I will endeavor to translate it from euphemism to plainspeak below:

1.  We Pharisees hate true Gospel evangelization, therefore we tell the Goy Catholics that to evangelize, the Church "must come out of itself." This statement implies a problem of shameful, sick Church ghettoization which must be remedied by 'coming out.' This is one way that we attack the integrity of Christian community and its evangelism. Simultaneously, we build higher the walls of the Judaic ghettos, from Brooklyn to [Counterfeit] Israel, and come out only for the purpose of moneymaking, buying off Goy representatives, hijacking Goy institutions, evangelizing our self-referential 'Noahide laws' and otherwise disrupting Goy community.

2. We self-refer to Talmud and Kabbalah but we forbid the Goy Catholics from any reference point of their own; only those supplied by us, primarily 'The Holocaust,' are permitted. 'Holocaust' referentiality is how we make the Church sick with shame and guilt. The 'Holocaust' referential Church is sick with shame of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (which we say caused 'The Holocaust'), keeps it hidden under a bushel and doesn't evangelize as the Gospel illustrates.

3. The Gospel (and doctrines and teachings derived from it) is the light which the Church has referred to and believed, to varying degrees, for 2000 years. When the Church is loosed from its Gospel foundation it gives way to that very serious evil, apostasy, which Christ and the Apostles most strenuously warned against. We replace this foundation with a crude counterfeit composite of De Lubac and 'The Holocaust,' etc. A Holocaust-referential Church gives glory to 'The Jews' and their myriad tales of suffering.

Put simply, there are two images of the Church, one which 'comes out' destroying the integrity of its teachings and community, an empty shell, good only for Noahide/Holocaust evangelization, in contrast to a Church which refers to Jesus Christ, His Gospel and His doctrines, teachings and sacraments, maintaining a strong Christ-referential community, evangelizing by welcoming others into the community of true Israel as equal members. The latter is threatening to our race-based, two-tiered Pharisaic ghetto protection racket and must be destroyed.

4. The next Pope must be a man who continues the work of drawing Pharisee-referential Noahidism and Holocaustolatry into the Church transforming it into an evangelical medium for we Pharisees. I, Jorge Bergoglio, humbly submit that I am the man for the job.

Also see:

The Pope's Bad Advice

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Moderate Orthodox Judaic Blasphemies Again Spray-Painted on Convent Wall

“This is not the first time there have been attacks on Christian places of worship and until now we’ve not heard of the trial of anyone involved,” [Archbishop Fouad Twal] told AFP at the scene.

If the 'Jews' allegedly behind this attack are extremists as reported by the press, then more so are the highest authorities of rabbinic Judaism whose codified writings blaspheme Jesus as a sexually depraved magician and his mother as a whore hairdresser among other such imbecilities. To call Jesus a monkey and his Mother a cow is arguably less offensive and 'extreme' than the blasphemies codified in the 'holy' texts of Orthodox Judaism. Moreover, slashing the tires of these nuns is nothing compared to the violence and killing permitted and indeed commanded by rabbinic Judaism to be meted out to 'Gentile' 'idolators' if it's determined that no appreciable backlash will result. In true context these would be the deeds of moderate adherents of Orthodox Judaism.

Extremist Jews Vandalize Israeli Catholic Convent in Price Tag Outrage

Graffiti Blasts Christians and U.S.-Led Peace Talks

JTA - April 01, 2014.

A Catholic monastery near Beit Shemesh was vandalized with anti-American and anti-Christian epithets. 
“America is Nazi Germany” and “Price Tag — Peace Agreement,” as well as “Jesus is a monkey” and “Mary is a cow,” were spray painted on the walls of the monastery. The tires of four vehicles also were slashed. 
The monastery is located in Deir a-Rafat village located close to Kibbutz Tzora near Beit Shemesh 
The vandalism was discovered by monks on Tuesday morning; Jerusalem police are investigating. 
Price tag refers to the strategy adopted by extremist settlers and their supporters generally to exact retribution for settlement freezes and demolitions or Palestinian attacks on Jews.
Other monasteries in the area have been victims of suspected price tag attacks in the past.


Friday, March 28, 2014

Francis' Counterfeit Israel Pilgrimage Itinerary

I believe there's a mistake in the itinerary below; that Francis will lay a wreath at Yad Vashem (in deference to Holocaustianity, his true religion) rather than Mount Herzl as stated. Whatever the case, his presence at Mount Herzl will signify a stronger endorsement of Zionist fanaticism than any of his predecessors. In context, even the bolshevik radical Paul VI, whose papacy ended only 36 years ago, did not recognize the Zionist state at all.

The Chief Rabbis of Counterfeit Israel, who Francis is scheduled to meet, uphold the letter of the talmudic law of genocidal, anti-goyite, racial supremacist Judaism and continually incite followers to act on Judaism's depraved teachings.

Francis' endorsement and acknowledgement of the Chief Rabbis reveals his carefully cultivated loving, merciful, humanitarian brand as a complete fraud. A true vicar of Christ would address these hate-filled Pharisees as Christ did.

As we know, Francis' 'conservative' predecessor Benedict XVI changed one of the most ancient prayers of the liturgy at the request of the Chief Rabbinate  and sat beside them during his pilgrimage to Counterfeit Israel.

These Popes are not vicars of Christ, they're vicars of the Pharisees.
Monday, 26 May 2014 
09:10 Visit to the Western Wall in Jerusalem

09:45 Laying of a wreath at Mount Herzl in Jerusalem

10:00 Visit to the Yad Vashem Memorial in Jerusalem Address of the Holy Father

10:45 Courtesy visit to the two chief rabbis of Israel at Heichal Shlomo Center in Jerusalem, next to the Jerusalem Great Synagogue Address of the Holy Father

11:45 Courtesy visit to the President of the State of Israel [Shimon Peres] in the Presidential Residence in Jerusalem Address of the Holy Father

13:00 Private audience with the Prime Minister of Israel {Benjamin Netanyahu] at Notre Dame Center in Jerusalem
20:00 FAREWELL FROM THE STATE OF ISRAEL at Ben Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv

Chief Rabbinate of Counterfeit Israel Rabbi: Assisting a 'Jew's' Cheating and Plagiarism an "Act of Kindness"

Ashkenazim bashers take note. Sefardic Rabbi Avraham Yosef sits on Counterfeit Israel's Chief Rabbinate council and is a son of the late Sefardi Chief Rabbi of Counterfeit Israel, Ovadia Yosef. His brother Yitzhak Yosef is the Chief Sefardi Rabbi of Counterfeit Israel.

As Thomas Jefferson said, the religion of Judaism is a system of moral depravity.


Leading Sefardi Haredi Rabbi Tells University Students It Is Kosher To Cheat And Plagiarize

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Aronofsky's Desperate Catholic Pandering

[Film director] Aronofsky has admitted that [the film produced by Israeli spy and arms smuggler, Arnon Milchan] “Noah” was being written by “two not very religious Jewish guys,” so [co-writer, Ari] Handel was calling Rabbi Dennis, author of the “Encyclopedia of Jewish Myth, Magic and Mysticism” (Llewellyn Publications), and a 2007 National Book Award finalist, to give a [rabbinic, kabbalistic] sense of the story. ("Noah Comes To The Big Screen With Help From A Dallas Rabbi," Jonathan Mark, The Jewish Week, 03/19/14)

See Aronofsky interview pandering out the other side of his mouth to 'the Goyim':

The 'Terror' of Noah: How Darren Aronofsky Interprets the Bible

In light of:

Russell Crowe And 'Noah' Director Plead For Pope Francis Endorsement At The Vatican

In light of:

Noahide Movie Reportedly Rejected by Target Audience

In light of:

Images: "Noah" Producer, Israeli Spy and Arms Smuggler, Arnon Milchan Hosts Prime Minister Netanyahu & Hollywood Elite at his Malibu Estate

Pope Francis gives the Italian Mafia Hell but High Praise to the Judaic Mafia

Pope Francis, why don't you warn your elder brothers of the Judaic mafia that they also, barring conversion, are hellbound? Where is your famous love and mercy for these antichrist elder brothers of yours running their protection racket, and more so the poor souls caught up in it?

You are a Pharisee; a hypocrite; one of them. You're a player in their protection racket. 

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Monday, March 17, 2014

Wrapping Up Bergoglio's Love and Promotion For Chagall's Hasidic 'Christ'

"My Christ as I depict him, is always the type of the Jewish martyr, in pogroms and in our other troubles, and not otherwise." (Marc Chagall, quoted in, From Rebel to Rabbi: Reclaiming Jesus and the Making of Modern Jewish Culture, Matthew B. Hoffman, p.225)

callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com has provided an English translation of the passage of a Bergoglio interview from El Jesuita: Conversaciones con el cardinal Jorge Bergoglio which informs my commentary on Pope Francis' love of the Hasidic 'Christ' figure depicted in Marc Chagall's White Crucifixion. Readers may recall that I drew attention to this the week of Bergoglio's election to the New Order papacy last year. For some reason, the key phrase from that passage was excised from the English translation which was published after Bergoglio became Pope Francis.

But the main emblem of Catholicism is a Crucified Christ dripping blood...

The exaltation of suffering in the Church depends heavily on the time and culture. The Church represents Christ in the cultural atmosphere of the time that one lived. Looking at the Eastern icons, the Russians, for example, it is found that there are few images of the crucified suffering. Rather it represents the resurrection. But if we look at the Spanish Baroque or Cuzco, we find the patience of Christ ripped away because the Baroque emphasized the passion of Jesus. The White Crucifixion, Chagall, who was a Jewish believer, is not cruel (but) it is hopeful. Pain is shown there calmly. I believe that it is one of the most beautiful things he painted.

At this point, Bergoglio turns smiling, perhaps to ease the talk.

Can I tell a story that comes to mind, he asked?


It is about a Jewish boy who thrown out of all schools for being unruly until another Jew recommends to the father a "good Catholic school." And it encourages him that, surely, there (they) are going to straighten (him out). The father takes the advice. Thus passes the first month and the boy is very well behaved, without warning (surprisingly). Nor has he behavior problems in the coming months. The father, won by curiosity, goes to the rector to know how he managed this transformation. “It was very simple," replied the priest. "On the first day I took him by the ear and said pointing to the crucifix, ‘That was a Jew like you, if you misbehave, you will end up the same.’ "

I stand firmly by the statement I made in answer to a reader's question, "Why Does Pope Francis Promote the Hasidic Painting, White Crucifixion?":

White Crucifixion is a bolshevik ideological representation of Jesus. It has nothing to do with the real Jesus or Gospel. It depicts a Hasidic "Jesus" who was crucified solely 'because he was a Jew,' just as it is alleged that 'Jews' are always persecuted, for no other reason than that 'they are Jews,' in other words, "Esau hates Jacob," the fundamental tenet of the protection racket of rabbinic Judaism. 
Chagall may have physically left the ghetto, but he was still preaching the message of the ghetto in his art. This is Chabad Lubavitch Hasidism par excellence. 
I believe this is why Pope Francis promotes this image, because it empowers the rabbinic racket by instilling fear in 'Jews' and shame in non-'Jews.'
Also see:

Counterfeit Israel's Counterfeit Jesus

Why Does Pope Francis Promote the Hasidic Painting, "The White Crucifixion"?

Pope Francis' Favorite Painting

Pope Francis' 'Modernist' Hasidism

More on Hasidic Painter, Marc Chagall's Golem 'Jesus' Resurrected by Pope Francis

Judeo-Chauvinist Definition of "Lunacy:" Identifying the Disproportion/Injustice of the 'Holocaust' Racket/Religion

Queen Esther: Patron Saint of Judaic Duplicity in Goy Societies

This article, while containing much valid information, in one fundamental point, is as dishonest as the cryptojudaic tradition it illustrates. Cryptojudaism is older than the book of Esther, the blueprint for Cryptojudaism, itself. It did not begin with the Spanish Inquisition, which while harsh, was a reaction to a very real problem, the same problem we see in West today where Khazar 'Mordechais' and 'Esthers' subvert governments to make war on non-Judaic 'enemies' in nations where Judaism is more accepted, safe and prosperous than ever.

The Esther and Mordechai tradition has always been about gaining power in the name of 'preventing genocide.'

Queen Esther: Patron saint of crypto-Jews

Ronit Treatman - The Times of Israel 
March 16, 2014

According to tradition, around 1,900 years before the Spanish Inquisition, a baby girl named Hadassah was born in the Persian Empire. She was orphaned at a very young age and her cousin Mordechai assumed custody of her. Under his tutelage, she internalized the spark of her Jewish identity.

After a few years, an opportunity presented itself, and Mordechai placed her in King Ahasuerus’ harem. He told her that her name was now Esther.

Mordechai told Esther that she was still a Jew, but that she must not let anyone know. If she was lucky, one day she could be the queen of Persia. It is said that she was a vegetarian, to avoid eating non-kosher meat. Queen Esther seemed to be fully assimilated, yet she never forgot who she really was. She hid her Judaism, and eventually married King Ahasuerus.

When the Spanish Catholic monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella established the Spanish Inquisition in 1478, many Jews converted to Catholicism outwardly. Inwardly, they kept practicing Judaism in secret, becoming anusim, conversos, or crypto-Jews.

Queen Esther was an inspiration to the anusim [insincere 'converts'] in that she modeled a way for them to remember and retain their true, hidden Jewish identity while integrating into the society around them. The conversos implemented a strategy to be able to continue practicing Jewish customs while hiding their observance by inserting a Jewish tradition into a Catholic practice or “syncretism” — the mixing of rituals from different religions.

When the Roman Catholic Church formally recognizes a person as a saint, this person is canonized. A person who has not been canonized may, however, still be referred to as a saint if it is believed that they are “completely perfect in holiness.” The crypto-Jews took advantage of this loophole.

Although Queen Esther was not canonized by the Catholic Church, the anusim transformed her into Saint Esther. They called her Santa Ester or Santa Esterica. They were able to continue honoring Purim by reinventing it as “The Festival of Saint Esther.”

The Festival of Saint Esther originated in Spain. When Spain issued the Edict of Expulsion in 1492, many Jews and conversos escaped to Portugal, taking their traditions with them. Their respite was short-lived and in 1497 the Portuguese king Manuel I married Princess Isabella, the daughter of the Spanish Monarchs Isabella and Ferdinand. A clause in this marriage contract extended the Spanish expulsion to Portugal, ousting the Jews once more.

The New World beckoned as a safe haven and the Spanish and Portuguese anusim were among the first settlers in the territories controlled by Spain in what is now Mexico. The Spanish Inquisition followed them to Mexico, however, pushing the conversos north.

The establishment of Nuevo León in the American Southwest is notable in that it was almost entirely carried out by crypto-Jews. Luis Carvajal y de la Cueva, a Portuguese converso, received a royal charter to settle this land without religious scrutiny of the pioneers who followed him. The Festival of Saint Esther was disseminated in the New World by these conversos. It was generally the women of the family who maintained this tradition.

The Festival of Saint Esther had two parts. The first part of the holiday was called the Fast of Queen Esther. The women fasted for three days. This fast replicated the fast Queen Esther asked of Mordechai and the Jews of Shushan before she approached King Ahasuerus.

It was too risky to celebrate the Festival of Saint Esther publicly. This was because the Spanish Inquisition considered such an activity to be Judaizing, or the adoption of Jewish beliefs. However, the archives of Mexico’s Inquisition retain testimony about this fast.

In 1643, Gabriel de Granada confessed that in his family, the women divided up the fast between them. Each would fast for one day. The punishment meted out by the tribunal of the Inquisition for Judaizing was “relaxation,” which meant burning at the stake.

Fasting had a special significance for the forced converts. In “The Fast of Esther in the Lore of the Marranos,” Moshe Orfali explains that the conversos felt that they lived in a constant state of sin. Fasting helped them atone.

The second, celebratory part of the festival was the Feast of Saint Esther. In her article “Women, Ritual, and Secrecy: The Creation of the Crypto-Jewish Culture,” Janet Liebman Jacobs relates that the women lit devotional candles in honor of Saint Esther. It was an occasion of mothers bonding with their daughters. They cooked a banquet together. The mothers took advantage of this opportunity to teach their daughters special family recipes that adhered to the remembered laws of kashrut.

The festive, public Purim celebration was transformed into a private meal held at home. As a result, many Jewish traditions were transmitted from mother to daughter.

The crypto-Jews also had their own special way of honoring Esther year round by enshrining her in a piece of art.

All Spanish colonies had a special type of religious art form called santo. Santos were statues made of wood or ivory which depicted the Virgin Mary, saints, or angels. In Latin America and the American Southwest, these statues were called bultos. The bultos were carved from wood, and then coated with a mixture of glue and gypsum, called gesso. They were then painted with vivid homemade pigments.

In crypto-Jewish homes, Queen Esther was fashioned into an icon and transformed into a bulto of Saint Esther.

Santo art was also expressed as devotional paintings called retablos. Traditionally, these were executed on sheets of metal such as copper or tin. Since there was a shortage of metal in the New World, the retablos were made of wood. Like the bultos, they were coated with gesso and painted. The paints were made from natural materials such as plants, insects, ash, and clay. Then they were varnished with tree resins. Crypto-Jews also commissioned retablos of Saint Esther.

It is less common to find bultos or retablos of Saint Esther in the American Southwest today. This is the legacy of Archbishop Peter Davis, who was the Archbishop of Santa Fe from 1964 to 1974. According to Jacobs, the archbishop wanted to get rid of all the Jewish rituals in New Mexico. He told his parishioners that there is no Saint Esther in Catholicism. and explained that the celebration of Esther is called Purim, and that Purim is part of the Jewish faith.

Despite Davis’ best efforts, it is still possible to find bultos and retablos of Saint Esther in crypto-Jewish homes today. In “The Book of Esther in Modern Research,” by Leonard Greenspoon and Sidnie White Crawford, for example, Santa Ester is portrayed as holding “a hanging-rope in one hand, and a crown in the other, weighing the danger of execution against the safety of royal immunity.”

There are also contemporary artists creating icons of Saint Esther. Charles Carrillo is one of New Mexico’s most prominent santeros, or artists that carve and paint saints. Carrillo earned a doctorate in archaeology from the University of New Mexico. While working on a dig, he became inspired by the work of the santeros. He conducted a lot of research, and became a self-taught artist whose mission is to preserve the homemade materials, techniques, and designs of the master santeros of 18th century colonial New Mexico. In 2006 he was awarded the National Endowment for the Arts National Heritage Award.

According to Carrillo there is a large community of crypto-Jews in New Mexico.

“They came here in the 1500s,” he told me. “I haven’t done one in a long time, but sometimes I still get a commission to create a Santa Ester.” There is an old saying in New Mexico, “A cada santo llega su función,” meaning that there is a saint for every occasion.

“My Santa Ester always has dark hair,” Carrillo said. “It’s a New Mexico tradition. I want my artwork to reflect her attributes. Esther means ‘Hadassah’ in Hebrew. Hadas is a myrtle or fragrant plant,” he explained.

In Carrillo’s retablo, Santa Ester is wearing a crown adorned with myrtle. She holds a myrtle branch in one hand. The rosette at the top of the retablo is decorated with myrtle branches. Santa Ester holds a scepter in her other hand that marks her as a queen. Her scepter is decorated with a pomegranate, an ancient Jewish symbol of fertility, promise, and fulfillment.

The red curtains framing Santa Ester are traditional in a New Mexico retablo. They are an allusion to a stage and symbolize that this has been revealed to us, and that we had better pay attention before the curtains close.

The Spanish Inquisition was formally ended in 1834. It is rational to believe that crypto-Judaism was something that existed in the past and is no longer occurring. However, it has persisted, and there are many anusim that continue their secret practices to this day while living in Spain, Portugal, Italy, Latin America, and the American Southwest.

Several organizations have been established in recent years to help anusim conduct research about their family background. Name Your Roots was formed in Israel by a group of academics who hope to help facilitate research into converso family names and customs. Shavei Israel, was created to assist those descendants of Jews who wish to return to Judaism.

I wondered what it feels like for a devout Catholic like Carrillo to create an icon that he knows is for crypto-Judaic purposes. “I am honored to be asked,” he said. “Ultimately, we all believe in the same God. It is my tradition to paint the images so the story may be told.”

Full Article:


Friday, March 14, 2014

Judaic Activist Promotes Female Religious Leadership for 'the Goyim,' not for 'Jews'

Please see:

Susannah Heschel, whose father, Abraham Heschel candidly admitted his dialogue with Catholicism was really about attacking Christians' souls with 'Holocaust' guilt, has a different, but equally preposterous approach to feminism according to which she does want change to come to pathologically misogynist rabbinic Judaism, but she blames that pathology not on the rabbis who invented it but, who else, the wicked 'Goyim.'
Back in 1983, Dr. Heschel pointed out that the Halakhic ruling that prohibits women from reading from the Torah was based on the idea that “a woman should not read out of the Torah out of respect for the congregation”. What kind of masculinity is constructed by the rabbinic system that envisions that a man’s honor would somehow be violated by a woman publicly reading from the Torah, she asked.

“Where does this sense of honor come from?” asks Dr. Heschel rhetorically. “Well, my field is German-Jewish history. It might surprise you to know that there’s a long historical tradition of German men fight duals over a matters of honor. It turns out that German men didn’t fight duals with Jews because they didn’t think Jews had any honor. Jews could not, in any way, diminish the honor possessed by a German man.

“So when it comes to the issue of a woman will bringing dishonor to the congregation by reciting a blessing on the Torah, that notion of honor is socially constructed. In contrast, I have a great sense that if I am a Jew, (blessing the Torah) brings honor to myself and every other Jew. And when I come across a passage that a woman would dishonor the Torah, then it’s obviously a social construction. It comes to alienate me from something that is, in fact, an inalienable right that we have as Jews. All Jews, male and female have these inalienable rights of honor. The question to ponder is: why historically did a non-Jew think that Jews have no honor? And why would Jewish men come to think that Jewish women lacked the honor to be called to Torah? These are questions that we have to pose sociologically and psychologically. These are constructs, not something that we’re born with. And by posing these questions, it means thinking more deeply, something we Jews are good at.”


On the contrary, it seems "we Jews" has had far too much to think, certainly on the topic of 'the Goyim.' Perhaps some good could come of this misdirected energy being channeled into honest self-reflection.

Monday, March 10, 2014

'Catholic' Herald Acclimates Catholics to 'Preemptive' Massacre Tradition of Rabbinic Judaism

 My comments and corrections interspersed in brackets:

Nun says repair of Hebrew scroll helped deepen Jewish-Catholic ties

By Simon Caldwell - [Rabbinic]-'Catholic' Herald

10 March 2014

A [rabbinic] scribe has restored a [rabbinic] scroll for an order of London-based nuns in a project [that is] an advance in “ever-deepening” [rabbinic]-Catholic relations…

[This] megillah [scroll is claimed to be] written in [usury and Judaism-permeated] Venice, Italy, in the late 18th century and was donated to the nuns by Jordan Cherrick, [a lawyer and adherent to the Soloveitchik strain of Orthodox Judaism, and his wife] who live in St. Louis...

The megillah is one of the most important scrolls in [rabbinic] Judaism. It tells [a story] of how Queen Esther and her uncle, Mordechai, saved the Jews from total extermination at the hands of the wicked Haman, royal adviser to King Ahasuerus of Persia, who cast purim (lots) to decide on which date he would annihilate them all. The fasting, prayer and courageous intervention of Esther saved the Jews, and Haman perished instead on the same gallows he had built for them [followed by an Esther and Mordechai-instigated 'preemptive' massacre of 75,800 Persian 'enemies'].

Today it is a [rabbinic] requirement of the [followers of the rabbis] that they all should hear the megillah read from a kosher scroll before they [get completely intoxicated on alcohol] at Purim [which accounts for much of the subversiveness, paranoia, vengefulness and general insanity plainly evident in the Judaic community]. This year [Purim] begins March 15. [Although "Haman" would have been dead for thousands of years now, rabbinic Judaism, which incorporates the pagan doctrine of reincarnation, is in perpetual search of reincarnated Amaleks and Hamans in every time and place].

[Out of guile or ignorance, God knows,] Mother McMonagle told the audience [the falsehood] that “Esther has remained very powerful in Catholic Christian religion, devotion and spirituality as a symbol, an image and a model of powerful intercession with God to change the course of human events from bad to good. Anybody from the [Khazar tribe of so-called 'Jews'] should be proud of that,” [she said, while, in fact, the book of Esther doesn't mention God at all, is never referenced in the New Testament, was categorized as uncanonical by many Church fathers, was nearly forgotten for centuries at a time and officially declared canonical after it's meaning had been entirely spiritualized, mystified and typified in a way that is utterly alien to the subversive, paranoid, bloody, vengeful rabbinic reading which Mother McMonagle seems to favor].

The story of Esther, she added, is [according to the rabbis] “a reminder of the horror of genocide in our own historical times — the Holocaust, Cambodia, Rwanda and others [excluding those perpetrated against Christians, especially European Christians, in which case it is read as a blueprint for subversion of their governments to perpetrate genocide against them and other populations the rabbis hate]. The need for Esther’s example is ever present in our [Judaism-addled] minds, whether we are ['Noahides'] or [Judaic]. [According to the rabbis] Esther is a memorial, a living point of confidence that [the self-chosen] can change things for [themselves], and [they] can do it by [hijacking Goy governments].”

Mordechai, whose English name is Marc Michaels, told the audience that the restoration was an “interfaith scribal adventure” [a typically disarming euphemism for subversion of Christianity]. He said it “was not a job that I would normally have expected to have done” but that it was a “real honor” to undertake [a mission similar to that of Mordechai of the Megillah, subverting Goy communities for tribal purposes].

“I never thought I would go to a convent quite so much in my life [since rabbinic law prohibits it], but it really was very, very [different than any convent of just 50 years ago. These nuns are true 'Noahides'],” he said.

He added that he first had to offer to buy the scroll from the nuns, because [pharisaic, anti-goyite rabbinic] law dictates that such sacred items should not be in the possession of gentiles …

Full, original, uncorrected article:


The Anti-Goyite Lampshade Libel

Sunday, March 9, 2014

The Reality of 'The Holocaust'

'Progressive' True Believers

Phil Weiss:

The [National Summit to Reassess the U.S.—Israel "Special Relationship"] conference had its share of lunacy. A Holocaust denier spoke up from the audience.
Imagine the horror, a 'Holocaust' denier speaking!

As it turns out, there was at least one 'progressive' 'Holocaust' true believer in the mostly conservative crowd (by invitation, I believe), what some of us might recognize as a less than fully sane position.

Perhaps Phil Weiss, at some opportune time, will think things through, define his terms and clarify what specifically "the reality of the Holocaust" entails and what degree of belief is necessary to not be censored, excommunicated and/or declared insane by his 'progressive,' 'enlightened,' 'diverse,' 'inclusive' and most of all, 'tolerant' movement.

Does Phil believe that this movement has any chance of real success with chauvanist Shoahmania stomping it down from the inside?

Also see:

It's Not Proper that "The Holocaust" Gets Special Billing