...But there are many Jews of good will who oppose this Christophobic campaign. Perhaps the most dramatic example is Orthodox Rabbi Daniel Lapin, founder of Toward Tradition. Rabbi Lapin’s public record is full of courageous statements of opposition to the Christophobes ...
Lapin is also on congressional record as being an accomplice to Zionist megalobbyist and convicted felon, Jack Abramoff who, among many other crimes, defrauded Native American tribes and used the proceeds to purchase weapons and night vision goggles for Israeli "settlers."
Lapin and Abramoff had a long history of collaboration together:
WASHINGTON -- In September 2000, before he became a target of federal investigations, Jack Abramoff was blazing a trail as a superlobbyist for Seattle-based Preston Gates & Ellis, bringing in millions of dollars in fees and earning a reputation as one of the town's premier influence traffickers.
So it wasn't surprising that Abramoff was nominated to join the Cosmos Club, one of Washington's most selective private clubs. For Abramoff, it was a major honor and yet another avenue to pursue his trade.
But Abramoff worried that his resume wasn't substantial enough to compete with a membership that includes senior government officials, ambassadors, Nobel Prize winners and business leaders.
The solution, Abramoff decided, was Mercer Island rabbi and Seattle talk-show host Daniel Lapin.
Lapin is far more than a local rabbi. He is a major player in the conservative religious movement, well known for his Toward Tradition, an organization that has a goal of "working to advance our nation toward the traditional Judeo-Christian values."
It was Lapin who introduced Abramoff to House majority leader Tom DeLay of Texas. Abramoff, in turn, helped Lapin establish Toward Tradition, and he named Lapin's brother, David, to a position at Eshkol Academy, a now-defunct private school in Columbia, Md., created by Abramoff that promised a high-quality Orthodox Jewish education.
Toward Tradition was just the kind of outfit Abramoff needed.
In an e-mail to Lapin on Sept. 15, 2000, with "HELP!" in the subject line, Abramoff described his dilemma. "Most prospective members have received awards and I have received none," he wrote.
"I was wondering if you thought it possible that I could put that I have received an award from Toward Tradition with a sufficient academic title, perhaps something like Scholar of Talmudic Studies?"
On Sept. 18, Lapin wrote to Abramoff: "Let's organize your many prestigious awards so they're ready to 'hang on the wall.' "
That same day, Lapin to Abramoff: "Yes, I just need to know what needs to be produced ... letters? Plaques? Neither?"
The next day, Abramoff to Lapin: "Probably just a few clever titles of awards, dates and that's it. As long as you can be the person to verify them (or we can have someone else verify one and you the other), we should be set. Do you have any creative titles or should I dip into my bag of tricks?"
This is who The Remnant tells us is a "Jew of good will." One wonders, what does it take to be considered a "Jew" of bad will in The Remnant's estimation? It's not enough that Rabbi Lapin is a Zionist of the most extreme bent; that he's an upholder of the anti-Christ Talmudic and Kabbalistic traditions; that he's a rabbinic infiltrator of Christian circles; that he was an accomplice to a convicted felon and agent of the Zionist state?
The Remnant's article continues:
Lapin is “a strong supporter of Pope Pius XII as a righteous gentile, a term he believes should be renamed ‘righteous Christian.’”
Since when has the opinion of a rabbi of the Talmud and Kabbalah been a gauge of any value whatever pertaining to Catholic matters? Who cares what Rabbi Lapin thinks about Pius XII? The entire Pius XII issue is a complete resource drainer like so much other nonsense occupying the minds of traditional Catholics today. And to be considered a "righteous gentile" (see: 'Noahide') by a rabbi is no Christian virtue. But here is The Remnant passing that rabbinic notion with their endorsement along to their readers.
The Remnant article goes on:
He has “lamented that the Holocaust Memorial Museum presents anti-Christian propaganda…”
Of course he has. It's precisely this way that Lapin has built inroads into the Christian camp. The attacks of the SPLC, The Holocaust Memorial Museum, the ADL, et al, have made it possible for Lapin to do so. Meanwhile the liberal rabbis continue their attack from without as he and his fellow infiltrating rabbis work from within, now aided by The Remnant.
But has Rabbi Lapin lamented the fact that the Holocaust Memorial Museum is in essence a U.S. taxpayer funded yeshiva for the new state religion of Holocaustolatry? Is he lobbying for the creation of an equal number of museums dedicated to the memory of the millions of Christians holocausted by the Judaic Bolsheviks? No? Then how is it that this blatant upholder of the rabbinic double standard has been baptised a "Jew of good will" by The Remnant? Whose interest does The Remnant serve here?
More from The Remnant's article:
Lapin has warned that “the biggest danger to the Jewish people is not Christianity but secular liberalism.”
Of course Lapin says that. He's a Kabbalist playing the right pillar against the left.. THAT'S WHAT KABBALISTS DO.
And the gutless, toothless, suicidal "Christianity" of our time--where "traditionalist" Catholics join forces with traditionalist rabbis in "restoring Christian society" (could there be a more insane notion?)--poses no threat to Lapin or his fellow rabbis to speak of. "Christians" today are the rabbis' golem. Look how prepared they are to go kill the rabbis' enemies in the Middle East. Look how they welcome the rabbis into their camp and praise them with glowing endorsements. The rabbis could never generate such valuable advertisement for themselves and their tradition as The Remnant has.
I could go on and on, but what's the use? The truth about the anti-Christ and anti-Christian nature of the rabbis and their tradition of trickery and double standards is available to anyone able to read in the work of Johannes Andreas Eisenmenger, Johan Buxtorf and Rev. Pranaitis from centuries ago and modern scholars, Michael A. Hoffman and Craig Heimbichner. Those who haven't fallen into the state of disorientation which the author of the Remnant article apparently has will understand the matter clearly and shun the rabbis and their Kabbalistic pillar-play in keeping with true Christian tradition. The rest I leave in God's hands. I harbor no illusions of being able to penetrate the hypnosis they labor under.