Wednesday, March 14, 2007

AIPAC Removes Constitutional Obstacles to War; Judaic Dialectics

EDITOR'S NOTE: The U.S. founding fathers, in their wisdom, made constitutional provisions specifically intended to prevent a warmongering tyrant president from running amok, as G. W. Bush under the influence of his Court "Jews" and philo-Judaic advisors has. AIPAC, in it's subversion, has sought to remove those constitutional provisions and to block any attempts to reinforce them. This shouldn't surprise anyone who knows that "Israel" doesn't even have a constitution. That's right. There's just the dialectic process and fluid case law. It's government based on Talmudic pilpul (dialectics), which brings us to this article and the dialectics which it's writer applies.

Note the highlighted text. This is what most people would consider "balanced" reporting. But is it though? Are both positions equally reasonable and worthy of consideration? That's what the term "balance" implies, doesn't it? This is only a matter of constitutional principles, and who takes those old things seriously anymore, right? Or, is the Zionist position--that the U.S. Constitution should be disregarded because it's an obstacle to Zionist warmongering--really equal to the position which maintains that the Constitutional principles that the U.S. was founded upon should be upheld?

No, of course, those are not equal positions. To represent these two positions as equally valid and worthy of consideration is no different than relativising child rape with traditional Christian parenting. That's precisely how rabbinic dialectics work. And there is a point to it all: the synthesis.

In this case the Zionists have moved closer to their goal of the destruction of Iran. And any irrational belief there is among the goyim that it's perfectly reasonable for the Zionists to destroy Iran while trashing the U.S. Constitution in the process is the synthesis that the dialectic process has yielded. Through the process of dialectics the US has gone from a nation based upon Constitutional principles to a nation which disregards and overturns it's Constitutional principles and accepts actions completely at odds with the U.S. Constitution for the sake of an enemy of the American people as perfectly reasonable.

Now, can you see how that process has also worked within the Church?

AIPAC backed removal of Iran war provision

AIPAC lobbying helped remove a provision from a bill that would have required President Bush to seek congressional approval for war against Iran. A number of congressional sources confirmed that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee backed dropping the provision from the Iraq war spending bill introduced Tuesday by Democrats. The bill ties funding to deadlines for withdrawal from Iraq.

AIPAC and a number of Democrats close to Israel said the provision would have hampered the president as he attempted to leverage Iran into backing down from its alleged nuclear weapon plans. Others said the provision simply reasserted the constitutional role of the U.S. Congress in declaring war that is believed to have been eroded by Bush during the Iraq war.

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/100580.html

56 comments:

Itzchak said...

Here's some sophisticated theology that is at your level of insight.

"Muslim clerics and many Arab leaders, who have denied that the First and Second Temples ever existed and that Ishmael and not Isaac (Yitzchak) was offered by Abraham as a sacrifice, have added a new idea: Abraham. Moses and Jesus actually were prophets of Islam.

Sheikh Taysir Tamimi, chief Palestinian Authority (PA) Justice and one of the most influential Muslim leaders in Israel, told Aaron Klein of WorldNetDaily, "Your Torah was falsified. The text as given to the Muslim prophet Moses never mentions Jerusalem. Maybe Jerusalem was mentioned in the rest of the Torah, which was falsified by the Jews." Tamimi added that the Jewish forefathers, Moses and Jesus were "prophets for the Israelites sent by Allah as to usher in Islam."

Concerning the Old City, he stated, "There is no Jewish connection to Israel before the Jews invaded in the 1880's. About these so-called two Temples, they never existed, certainly not at the Haram Al- Sharif [Temple Mount].

"The Western wall is the western wall of the Al Aqsa Mosque. It's where Prophet Muhammad tied his animal which took him from Mecca to Jerusalem to receive the revelations of Allah."

rev'd up said...

It is the desire of Judaics to "synthesize" the goy into their worldview, both politically and religiously. What gentiles need to realize is that we are stepping-stones that, once used, will be disposed of. It is fair to say that "synthesis" is a euphemistic term for, "We Jews are going to deliver, you goy are going to receive."

We need to insist on the rule of Law, both Church and natural. Dialectic or case "law" takes us in the opposite direction; to the extent that the rabbis have even claimed to be able to out-wit God--SICK. If we wish to survive, they must begin to play by our Christian rules.

We must proselytize the Jews...begining with you itzchak! There is a reason Almighty God has given you a fascination with Traditional Catholicism. Give up your Talmud, read the real Torah (Old Testement), repent and be baptized in the Name of the Father & of the Son & of the Holy Ghost.

Itzchak said...

I'm glad to see you have a sense of humor.
My fascination is similar to the fascination I have with neo-Nazis and others obsessed with Jews/Judaism. Though I must admit that now that I see that you guys also incorporate the insanity of Holocaust denial, that the fascination is turning into disgust.

Anonymous said...

Yours is just another voice of crying "Holocaust denial" to the likes of Deborah Lipstadt and others, despite the fact that the so-called "Holocaust deniers" have tested the hypotheses of these so-called Holocaust historians and found them wanting in many ways.

Itzchak said...

"so-called "Holocaust deniers"
Are you denying that they're Holocaust deniers?

Anonymous said...

Maurice:

Check out the crypto Jewry on this post that corrupts the Church:

http://closedcafeteria.blogspot.com/2007/03/shameful-history-of-judensau.html

Anonymous said...

Rather:

http://closedcafeteria.blogspot.com/2007/03/shameful-history-of-judensau.html

Anonymous said...

Sorry,

history-of-judensau.html

Anonymous said...

I deny that they deny the persecution of Jews and the deaths that occurred. What the revisionists deny are several planks of the official story of the Holocaust, like the gas chambers (many were faked by the Soviets, as admitted by even the ones who still hold to the gas chambers story) and the cremation pits. So many holes in the story to say the least.

rev'd up said...

"Sense of Humor" my eye. What kind of future does Jewry have? A flim-flam religion that promotes buggery, rape, murder, slavery, usury... you name it.

Have you ever read the Psalms? Ever read the prophets (try Jeremiah vii.1)? They CONDEMN Judaism. Save yourself from the justice of God. Without the blinder's of the Talmud perhaps you would see it plainly.

Itzchak said...

"Have you ever read the Psalms? Ever read the prophets "
I'm sure I've read them way more than you have and I read them in the original Hebrew. Another advantage of being Israeli born.

rev'd up said...

"read them way more than you"

Perhaps... but it's not quantity that matters it's UNDERSTANDING. Reading it once and the light goes on, is better than a hundred readings in darkness.

Dialogue is a path to darkness. It makes the strait, crooked and the plain, rough.

Itzchak said...

"Dialogue is a path to darkness. It makes the strait, crooked and the plain, rough."

And that's why you support a blog that contains all the classic age old anti-Semitic rants about Jews and condemns any clergy involved in interfaith dialogues.
btw ..it's spelled 'straight'.

Itzchak said...

Here's a worthwile site:
http://www.thegodmovie.com/clip-TheGap.php

Anonymous said...

"Anti-Semitic" this, "anti-Semitic" that. Prove it. Prove that Catholics hate Jews because of race.

Itzchak said...

You're right it's being used sloppily . The more precise term would be antiJewish. It's just what's been used colloqualy to describe hatred of Jews. I suppose you would say you don't hate Jews, you hate Judaism.

Itzchak said...

Rev. Revved Up:
"Sense of Humor" my eye. What kind of future does Jewry have?
Considering we control everything, we have a wonderful future.:)

rev'd up said...

I wouldn't say "control everything." There's about 98% of the world's population that Judaics only hope to control.

They're like the shop keeper who said, "If it weren't for the employees and customers... I'd have the best job in the world."

What must scare the Judaics is that they can no longer pull the wool over everyones eyes as they once did. The internet is unravelling their precious plot against the Church and mankind. The future looks bleak for Jewry. Whose main problem will be that there is no longer a country into which to expel them--everybody's wising up.

Itzchak said...

"What must scare the Judaics is that they can no longer pull the wool over everyones eyes as they once did. The internet is unravelling their precious plot against the Church and mankind."

Get a grip on reality. You really think that anybody but the regular bunch of crazies takes this drivel seriously. Have you noticed that . about three people (in addition to myself) that ever comment on anything on this silly site.

The future looks bleak for Jewry. Whose main problem will be that there is no longer a country into which to expel them--everybody's wising up.

Again, a grip on reality would be helpful here. Jewry and 'Judaics' have never been stronger. Israel with its challenges is thriving,
a few years ago 22 countries were officially at war with it. Most of them have given up. Iran is basically the only one left.

Did you notice that last year Warren Buffett bought an Israeli company, the first time he has ever bought a company outside of the US.
There's a reason for that.

I could go on but I must catch a plane as I go on another teaching trip and share the wonders (actually, darkness) of trad. RC with interested audiences.
You guys have given me wonderful material. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Titurator Veritatis

Hey itzchak,

I just wanted my name up as a crazy. Thank you for your broad and magnanimous perspective which might also be called megalomania.

Anonymous said...

Israel indeed is thriving from terrorism. Its first leaders were the first terrorists, not the Muslims. The Irgun, etc., terrorized whole villages and killed British soldiers so that the UK withdrew from Palestine. Then these terrorists illegally and immorally declared the state of Israel in 1948.

Yeah, the foundation of Israel is sure just. Yeah, right!!

rev'd up said...

"For he hath said in his heart, Tush, I shall never be cast down, there shall no harm happen unto me." (Psalm x.6)

My friend itzchak, I do have a "grip on reality." It is you and your cronies that need to realize that the goyim are not your cake to eat as you please.

"Behold ye trust in lying words, that cannot profit. Will ye steal, murder, and commit adultery, and swear falsely, and burn incense unto Baal, and walk after other gods whom ye know not; and come and stand before me in this house, which is called by my name, and say, We are delivered to do all these abominations?" (Jeremiah vii.8ff)

God is your judge...He will laugh you to scorn when your calamity comes...Save yourself from the wrath to come.

Maurice Pinay said...

itzchak: "I'm simply curious how anyone can actually believe in the reality of the virgin birth and the reality redemption through somebody's death...

itzchak:"I see that you guys also incorporate the insanity of Holocaust denial ..."

You don't assent your will to my dogmas and neither do I assent my will to your dogmas. The difference is that today, denying your dogmas results in banishment, fines, book burnings, and prison time.

Thank you, itzchak, for being a case study in Judaic double standards.

Itzchak said...

A hotel with internet keeps me intouch with all these stupendous understandings:
"Its first leaders were the first terrorists, not the Muslims."
Look up Amin Al Husseini and what happened in 1929.
-----------------------
"Titurator Veritatis

Hey itzchak,

I just wanted my name up as a crazy. Thank you for your broad and magnanimous perspective which might also be called megalomania."
Titurator...I've missed you and wondered where you were. So I take it your craziness also extends to this Holocaust denial junk.?
-------------------
This integration of Neo-Nazism and Christianity is ...(I'll leave it to your fertile imaginations).

Shabbat Shalom

Anonymous said...

"Neo-Nazism"? Your ignorance betrays you so badly, it's not even funny. Just harp on like the liberals do, accusing people of neo-Nazism (combined with Christianity), when someone doesn't agree about the so-called Holocaust, or someone says that the Zionist regime in Palestine is genocidal.

Maurice Pinay said...

So I take it your craziness also extends to this Holocaust denial junk.?

itchak apparently believes that it's "crazy junk" to deny holocaust fables but that it's reasonable and sane to throw people who resist holocaust fable indoctrination into a dungeon for 5 years.

The fact that itchak is a citizen of a state which is propped up by holocaust fables and that he's an adherant of a religion of fables clearly accounts for this position.

itzchak, never forget the 4 billion Jews killed by the Romans whose history was piously recorded in Bavli, Gittin 57b by the great storytellers of your lying religion of overblown racist fables.

Maurice Pinay said...

itzchak, I'm beginning to be concerned about the amount of time that you invest here. You must be neglecting the ritual practices of your religion.

Why don't you take some time to bless the sun and moon, curse some Christian cemeteries, or perhaps issue a Pulsa D'nura death curse on someone so that your Neshama is not compromised. Otherwise, you may not be as bright a light unto the nations as you are to this blog. That would be a terrible tragedy. I don't want to hog up all of your blessings!

rev'd up said...

"Pulsa D'nura death curse"

Wow! I didn't know Jews could do that. Now I know. Looked it up on Wikipedia (Goy!)...the rabbi says it's not supposed to make someone "really" die--just "kind of" die. I bet it works best punctuated by an Uzi.

titurator veritatis said...

Itzchak,

"Titurator...I've missed you and wondered where you were. So I take it your craziness also extends to this Holocaust denial junk.?"


Well, let me first quote a passage from Mr. Michael Hoffman II. This is from his introduction to the reissue of Johann Andreas Eisenmenger's The Traditions of the Jews.

"Always Judaism is assumed by its adherents to be the exception to the rules and customs by which all others are judged. This is the Talmudic mentality of entitlement. Judaic chauvinism cannot see the world otherwise and curses all those who fail to share in their tunnel-vision as "Jew-haters" and "anti-semites." But for many out side of Judaism, these demands for exceptional protection and immunity are not reasonable accommodations of a human right, but the function of an advantage which an ideology seeks to gain over its rivals." Page 20.

So, with these words as the backdrop I will say that I do not deny that Jews did indeed die during the course of the war. However, I would say that more died of sicknesses and illnesses that are naturally contracted in an environment associated with a prison camp than with the sacraments of the 'holocaust.' One such disease would be Typhoid. But this gets to the heart of the quotation from above. Innumerable people died in that war---what makes your people more important than a Titus Bransdsma or a Gypsy? This is the double-standard. The whole culture is awash with philo-Judiac apologists but who preserves the memories of the others? The final issue is whether there was a specific, coordinated plan to dispose of Jewry throughout the Reich. I have not seen evidence to support this (and I am not a Nazi-sympathizer). The issue is the historical issue Itzchak----there has to be transparency in historical matters. The goyim do not just accept what is put on the platter. One final point related to this.

When I was in the 7th grade, my classmates and I were subjected to a holocaust curriculum where we saw the typical photos of bodies strewn about helter-skelter with their white and black stripped uniforms and the omnipresent star of David. I did not like it then and I do not like it now----why don't I like it? Well, when you know that during the Civil War in America, just after the advent of photography, the bodies of the dead were moved, rearranged, stripped and repositioned for the sake of sensationalism---why should anybody believe or take the word of an 'Allied' photographer after the liberation of the prison camps? Am I supposed to believe because I am American and the photographers were 'Allies' and we are on the same team? Balderdash! It is absurd because the interpretation of history or shall I say the presentation of history to the masses frames all subsequent conversations after the conflict---this history and the conversations associated with it are predicated upon a premise and if that premise is lacking the requisite level of veracity---then all subsequent premises are so much refuse. So Itzchak, the history and 'holocaust' issue has to be transparent and so long as it is not; your tenants are all the weaker and will be subjected to the tenacious hammer of scrutiny.

Itzchak said...

"perhaps issue a Pulsa D'nura death curse on someone "
funny you should mentionthat...
I jsut returned from a symposium and small group discussion where I shared with people some of the perspectives held here...
A number of people told me that I shouldn't engage with this darkness, because some body connected to this sight and its twisted perspective might try to find me and hurt me...I told them they were being ridiculous.
They were being ridiculous, right?

Itzchak said...

Mr. T.V is it Father or?)said:Well, let me first quote a passage from Mr. Michael Hoffman II:
If this is your inspiration and guide, then that does say something.
I actually wish you were right about what took place in those camps. Unfortunately (for me) approx. 90% of my mother and father's families were murdered in Auschwitz and I've talked to too many eyewitnesses (including my mother). Including Sigmund Sobolewski- who was a Roman Catholic prisoner who spent 5 years there.

titurator veritatis said...

"Itzchak, the history and 'holocaust' issue has to be transparent and so long as it is not; your tenants are all the weaker and will be subjected to the tenacious hammer of scrutiny."

Itzchak, this is the point---the history is not transparent enough and moreover, I am sick of having to bend my knee at the memory of one particular group will letting the memories of others to ignominiously die. Can you not understand that?

Maurice Pinay said...

A number of people told me that I shouldn't engage with this darkness, because some body connected to this sight and its twisted perspective might try to find me and hurt me...I told them they were being ridiculous.
They were being ridiculous, right?


That's funny, itzchak.

I wonder what they would say about this:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/02/we-killed-jesus-and-well-kill-you-too.html

Anonymous said...

Eyewitness accounts are the weakest form of evidence. That's all I've got to say. It must be supported by physical evidence and in Auschwitz there is nothing to support gas chambers.

Itzchak said...

"That's funny, itzchak."

That's a relief, then I have nothing to worry about, right?

Itzchak said...

"Eyewitness accounts are the weakest form of evidence. That's all I've got to say."

If you would study your Bible (and Talmud, -sorry, couldn't resist) regularly, you'll see that according to Biblical law eyewitness is the strongest form of evidence.

Itzchak said...

"the memory of one particular group will letting the memories of others to ignominiously die. Can you not understand that?"

Who said anything about letting the memories of other ignomiously die. If you do research, you'll see that Jewish idealists of all backgrounds are deeply involved in relief efforts of many people who have undergone/are undergoing real genocide (the attempt to describe the Arab/Israeli conflict in its current manifestation as genocide is making the term genocide meaningless and a disservice to where it's really happening.
Do you know that the majority of real efforts to ensure that the Israeli arm not misuse its considerable power is fueled by groups of Israelis Jews, BeTzelem and others.
I have been involved in many activities in support of aboriginal people in North America.
As a rabbi i've been parts of memorials services organized by Armenians remembering their experiences.

Many Jewish people are involved in trying to stop the real genocide in Darfur..many Jewish organizations have joined this effort. etc. etc.

Elie Wiesel has used his experience and gravitas to highlight countless tragedies
of non Jews all over the world...

Itzchak said...

'The final issue is whether there was a specific, coordinated plan to dispose of Jewry throughout the Reich. I have not seen evidence to support this""

This is bizarre to say the least, this is one of the most documented events with most of the documentation being provided by the meticulous German Nazi machine.Surely you've heard of the Wansee conference.

Maurice Pinay said...

That's a relief, then I have nothing to worry about, right?

This is what I'm worried about:

The effects of alcohol, and Judaism

Anonymous said...

I love your wit Maurice

rev'd up said...

"find me and hurt me...I told them they were being ridiculous.
They were being ridiculous, right?"

itzchak my friend, you flatter yourself...it is very un-becomming.

rev'd up said...

I must confess, I did look for you in my phone book...alas, no one named itzchak. :(

Itzchak said...

"This is what I'm worried about:"
You're worried about those kids swearing at you?
I'm curious, have you ever been to Israel?
--------------------
and reverend revv'ed up:
It's 'unbecoming'

Itzchak said...

'I must confess, I did look for you in my phone book...alas, no one named itzchak. :( "
Now if you lived in Jerusalem....
Have you ever been to Israel?

rev'd up said...

What cha-HOOT-spa!

Maurice Pinay said...

You're worried about those kids swearing at you?

You're the blog jester, itzchack: an anti-Chistian bigot apologist for Judaic double standards, racial supremacism, self-entitlement to Palestinian land and the violence against non-"Jews" that these sick ideologies foment.

And here you are implying that you have something to fear from us?

You clown.

Write back anytime. Your service here is invaluable.

Itzchak said...

There's a reason I chose the name Itzchak here...

Itzchak said...

"an anti-Chistian bigot"
let's get this clear...
I have nothing against Christian people individually...
some of my best friends are Christian....
(somehow I doubt you guys have many 'Judaic' friends)

rev'd up said...

"some of my best friends are Christian...."

"Christian" what? Wanabees. John Hagee, Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Rod Parsley, Dr. Dobson, Joel Osteen, Bennie Hinn, et al.

You can have 'em. A septic gang of Bandar-log no better than their dissembling masters.

Maurice Pinay said...

There's a reason I chose the name Itzchak here...

We've heard more than enough "Songs of the Murdered Jewish People."

You're no victim. Your people are aggressors at least as ideologically sick as the Nazis. And they would be far more destructive than the Nazis if they could just get the U.S. military to work faster, but they're catching up nevertheless. The recent barbarity in Lebanon and the Palestinian territories is a very strong case in point. So is their incessant screeching for Persian blood at anyone who will listen, and even those who would rather not.

Millions of people besides "Jews" have suffered through terrible attrocities, many times at the hands of Judaics, as in Russia and Turkey. Who's writing poems for them, much less making movies, documentaries, and museums?

Your claims to victimhood can only be laughed at.

Go join your fellow "victims" in Hebron and spit at some Christians or stone some foreign aid workers and then go out for drinks on the U.S. taxpayer. "Victim."

Itzchak said...

thanks for the link to that poem...it'll be perfect for a program that i'm participating in..
I never said I was a victim...
I proudly served in the Israel Defense Forces.

Maurice Pinay said...

I proudly served in the Israel Defense Forces.

...alongside other proud racial supremacist thugs like these guys:

"Nice Jewish Boys" on "Cleansing Missions" in the Palestinian Territories

Itzchak said...

It's a shame, they really need to get guidance from the good old non-violent Christian soldiers
of the crusades, for example.

Maurice Pinay said...

It's a shame, they really need to get guidance from the good old non-violent Christian soldiers
of the crusades, for example.


We're dealing with the sickness of racial supremacism here. And those IDF thugs learned it from the rabbis.

Itzchak said...

"We're dealing with the sickness of racial supremacism here."
Actually, "we're" dealing with war.

Maurice Pinay said...

IDF thug: "I don't know what we're doing here (in Palestinian territory), purification maybe. It's dirty here. I don't know why a good Hebrew boy should be here so far from his home."

This, itzchack, is 100% pure Judaic racial supremacy. No amount of obfuscation or cajolery can cover it up.

And since your welfare state and it's military exists only due to lavish funding extracted from the U.S. taxpayer, I have every right to use the term "we" in this context as much as I'd prefer not to.