Saturday, March 24, 2007

"Lost Tomb of Jesus" Director, Simcha Jacobovici: Power-"Jew"

EDITOR'S NOTE: The US media has promoted James Cameron as the spokesman for the "The Lost Tomb of Jesus," but the Judaic press is not so coy. There we find the real force behind the mockery and his impressive power-Zionist, Orthodox Judaic credentials.



... Jacobovici ... 54-year-old ... Israeli.

... Jacobovici's ... history ... (He) ... moved to Canada, where he was an activist for Jewish causes (he chaired the North American Jewish Students' Network; founded and chaired Network Canada, the country's national union of Jewish students; founded the Canadian Universities Bureau of the Canadian Zionist Federation; and served on the national executive of the Canadian Jewish Congress; was invited to share the dais with prime minister Menachem Begin in 1978, following his announcement of the peace accord with Egypt; was president of the International Congress of the World Union of Jewish Students; and in 1980 - the year the "Jesus tomb" he would investigate a quarter of a century later was discovered - he was awarded the Knesset Medal for his Zionist work on North American campuses, ...

Today, the married father of five is an Orthodox Jew, who dines with his Hollywood peers on the kosher food he requests. And Shabbat is sacred. "At the end of the day," says Jacobovici, adjusting his lushly embroidered kippa crowning a head of nape-length hair, "if you refuse to compromise, others come around."

"I was born in Israel in 1953 ..."

"I came back to Israel for two years to serve in the army ..." ("One on One: The cross he bears," Ruthie Blum, Jerusalem Post, Mar 21, 2007)

full article:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173879142008&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull


John Katz, a former professor of Jewish film at York University, is familiar with Jacobovici's films and also knows him personally through the synagogue Jacobovici founded. "Simcha becomes more of an advocate in his films for an idea, an argument, than a lot of filmmakers," he says. "His films don't have that pasty indecisiveness that a lot of them do." Jacobovici does achieve a degree of journalistic objectivity because of his Talmudic approach to filmmaking ...

"We were encouraged to talk back, we were encouraged to break rules, we were told that there were no rules for us." (Simcha Jacobovici)

http://www.simchaj.ca/blog/AboutSimcha/_archives/2004/4/3/905445.html

Bill Donahue of "The Catholic League" tells us that none of this is significant--Jacobovici's rabid adherence to the 2000 year-old Judaic tradition of slander against Jesus Christ has no bearing upon his decision to make a "documentary" which slanders Jesus Christ. Whose interests does Bill Donahue represent?

47 comments:

rev'd up said...

I read some of Donohue's comments about "Lost Tomb" and am left wondering what planet he lives on. He blames the attacks against Christianity on "wild-eyed speculators" and "cultural fascists." Implying in the end that Muslims are behind it all.

He knows full well that Cameron, Jacobivici and all the rest of the blasphemers are Joos. Donohue is one of their flim-flam boys.

The Catholic League's mission statement reads:

"When slanderous assaults are made against the Catholic Church, the Catholic League hits the newspapers, television, and radio talk shows defending the right of the Church to promote its teachings with as much verve as any other institution in society."

--Them's big words, it's about time they started living up to it.

Maurice Pinay said...

I've seen no evidence that Cameron is of Judaic descent.

I don't know if Cameron's involvement is based in Judaic, occult, Masonic, Zionist, or some other anti-Christian ideology or just plain greed and ambition. I've seen no evidence either way. But his involvement in "The Lost Tomb of Jesus" mockery is contemptible regardless of what motivates him.

The point is that we do know with absolute certainty that Jacobivici's slander has a basis in a 2000 year-old tradition. The media for the goys (and Bill Donahue) covers that fact up. The media for Judaics revels in it. Everyone should have equal access to this information.

Itzchak said...

I think it's because Cameron likes to be with the winning team.

Maurice Pinay said...

Jacobovici reveals the "winning team's" strategy at his website:

"We were encouraged to talk back, we were encouraged to break rules, we were told that there were no rules for us."

http://www.simchaj.ca/blog/AboutSimcha/_archives/2004/4/3/905445.html

There are many strictly enforced rules for the goys however, the cardinal rule today being: don't ask questions about "The Holocaust!"

Hypocrisy and double standards from the upholders of the rabbinic tradition of hypocrisy and double standards.

Anonymous said...

What difference does it make whether Jacobovici is a Jew (like Jesus) or not. Most of the critics against this find (like Israeli academics) are themselves Jews. Some people would always be politically correct, and some people will always be non-conformists, whether they're Jews, Christian or Atheists.

Maurice Pinay said...

What difference does it make whether Jacobovici is a Jew (like Jesus) or not.

Jacobovici is not a Jew. He's a Khazar. And even if he was a true descendant of the tribe of Judah, it would make no difference to me. Ethnicity, in and of itself, is a non-issue here.

And the liar, Jacobovici, most certainly is not like Jesus Christ in any way whatsoever.

Most of the critics against this find (like Israeli academics) are themselves Jews.

I'd be as impressed if they reported the fact that the sky is blue. Scholars need to maintain some semblance of truthfulness if they want to be taken seriously. The tomb is a patent fraud.

Some people would always be politically correct, and some people will always be non-conformists, whether they're Jews, Christian or Atheists.

Most all Judaics maintain the tradition of tribalism and racial conceit whether they become conservative, reform, communist, atheist or otherwise. But I've addressed a specific individual here, Simcha Jacobovici.

I've called attention to the fact that Jacobovici is a rabid upholder of Zionism and the ideological tradition of rabbinic Judaism which slanders and blasphemes Jesus Christ. Jacobovici has made a "documentary" which slanders and blasphemes Christ. It is perfectly reasonable to make a connection between Jacobovici's work and his beliefs. It is perfectly reasonable to believe that the non-Judaics whom this "documentary" is marketed towards should be as aware of Jacobovici's rabid Zionism and adherence to rabbinic Judaism as his fellow Judaics are, if not, even more so.

Jacobovici is an opinion shaper with an agenda. The people whose beliefs Jacobovici is attempting to shape should know what his Zionist, Judaic agenda is. The US media is covering this up. Bill Donahue is covering it up.

There is no ethnic/"racial" component to this whatsoever, aside from the fact that Khazars of Judaic background tend to share Jacobovici's ideology and tribalism to varying degrees as a result of that ideology being passed from generation to generation as is the case in all of the Judaic ethnic sects. But the ideology is completely independent of ethnicity/"race".

Some Judaics have liberated themselves from the insanity of rabbinic Judaism and Judaic tribalism and I do take note of that fact, but there are not nearly enough.

I suspect that as self-appointed Judaic leaders continue to self destruct and expose themselves as tyrannical clowns that more Judaics will break rank.

Itzchak said...

You're going to even more disappointed. There are more "Judaics" studying Torah now than there ever has been in history.

Maurice Pinay said...

There are more "Judaics" studying Torah now than there ever has been in history.

You mean the non-Biblical Judaic canon: Talmud, Kabbalah, etc., of course.

I have no idea what you've based this claim upon, but I'm happy to know that there are more non-Judaics also studying these texts in the spirit of Johannes Eisenmenger and revealing the hostility, double standards, racial supremacism, superstition and general stupidity of the Judaic tradition to the world.

It truly is a renaissance in Judaic study, itzchak!

Itzchak said...

With every comment, you display your ignorance of the real content of Torah, Kabbalah and Talmud.
I suggest you begin with Sefer Yetzirah, you may actually learn something.

Anonymous said...

could someone tell me where it is stated that the israelites (including the house of judah, and therefore to include Jesus Christ) are jews?

could someone tell me where abraham, isaac, and jacob/israel are called jews in the old testament?

why is it that the first place in the old testament where the term jew is used (kings) they are at war with the israelites?

Anonymous said...

"What difference does it make whether Jacobovici is a Jew (like Jesus) or not. Most of the critics against this find (like Israeli academics) are themselves Jews."

This is one of their favorite tricks, i.e., pretending to be dividied among themselves so that the goyim do not see that all Jews really do work against Christ. One Jew comes out with a major slam against Christ, and other Jews come out against it. But in reality, they're all on the same team. This just keeps the goyim confused.

Itzchak said...

"This is one of their favorite tricks, i.e., pretending to be dividied among themselves so that the goyim do not see that all Jews really do work against Christ"

Yes, we have secret meetings one a month (twice monthly if the situation warrants it) to decide which side we'll be presenting and divide up the perspectives so that each is represented.
Please don't tell anyone. They're secret.

Itzchak said...

Why did you excise my comments on mis-translations?

Maurice Pinay said...

With every comment, you display your ignorance of the real content of Torah, Kabbalah and Talmud.
I suggest you begin with Sefer Yetzirah, you may actually learn something.


... about the Pantheist, dualist system which the rabbis picked up from the Eastern mystery religions and subsequently blamed on the Prophets. Great advice.

My God, the God of the faithful Israelites (not the golden calf worshippers), is not materially a part of rocks, trees, and "the Jews" in contrast to the non-Jews who allegedly emanate from the demonic kelipot.

Funny how the great rabbinic sages couldn't even get pantheism right. Everything is one with God except for the non-"Jews." I guess it illustrates what kind of philosophy is produced by compulsively racist minds.

Maurice Pinay said...

Why did you excise my comments on mis-translations?

This isn't a platform for off-topic attacks on Christianity. You can respond to the topics at hand and defend your religion all you like, but in the interest of keeping focus there will be no attacks against Christianity here.

You should have no problem finding someplace else that welcomes that kind of discussion.

Itzchak said...

"I suggest you begin with Sefer Yetzirah, you may actually learn something."

"... about the Pantheist, dualist system which the rabbis picked up from the Eastern mystery religions and subsequently blamed on the Prophets. Great advice."

This comment proves my point about ignorance of content. Do you have any idea of what Sefer Yetzira is about?

Itzchak said...

"there will be no attacks against Christianity here."

Oh I see, only attacks on Judaism are allowed here. It's your war.

---------------------------

Maurice Pinay said...

Oh I see, only attacks on Judaism are allowed here.

No. Critical analysis of Judaism takes place here on my "piddling" little blog because it's blacked out nearly everyplace else. On the other hand, "critical analysis" of Christianity is projected by the media behemoth, the "education" system and countless other institutions in the formerly civilized West daily.

The disproportion in your expectations is just further evidence of the Judaic double standard.

There will be no further discussion on the matter.

Maurice Pinay said...

Do you have any idea of what Sefer Yetzira is about?

Yes I do. The most significant point being that it has nothing to do with the Biblical Patriarchs and a lot to do with some very confused rabbis.

Itzchak said...

"Do you have any idea of what Sefer Yetzira is about?

Yes I do. The most significant point being that it has nothing to do with the Biblical Patriarchs and a lot to do with some very confused rabbis."
----------------
That answer displays absolute no knowledge or understanding of this book.

Maurice Pinay said...

That answer displays absolute no knowledge or understanding of this book.

It does, in fact. It's just not something you'd care for people to know about. You probably adhere to the ridiculous belief that Kabbalah was secretly passed down to your rabbis from the Biblical Patriachs.

And since your question has nothing to do with the topic at hand--the power-Judaic, Simcha Jacobovici; his blasphemy against Christ and it's basis in rabbinic Judaism--that's all I have to say on the matter for now.

We'll be addressing Kabbalah further in due time.

Itzchak said...

"It's just not something you'd care for people to know about."

Actually, I would love people here to know about it. It would give them some content as opposed to the empty, distorted translations that their "understanding" is based on.

Maurice Pinay said...

Actually, I would love people here to know about it.

The "it" being addressed here is the fact that Kabbalah most definitely was not passed to the rabbis through the Biblical Patriarchs. If you would love for people to be aware of that fact, then that's good news.

Itzchak said...

You don't think the Biblical Patriarchs (and Matriarchs) knew anything about the inner nature of reality?

Maurice Pinay said...

I know that the Biblical Patriarchs did not pass down a secret tradition explaining the "inner nature of reality" to your rabbis.

I can say quite confidently that the last place I would send anyone looking for any insight on any topic--least of all religion and philosophy--would be to the rabbis and their texts.

Itzchak said...

"I can say quite confidently that the last place I would send anyone looking for any insight on any topic--least of all religion and philosophy--would be to the rabbis and their texts."

Comments like this display an extraordinary ignorance.

I have taught Jewish religious texts and thought to classes including priests, nuns and the like. They were/are often amazed at the level of depth and insight that the Jewish tradition contained about subjects (esp. Bible) and often commented that
Christian commentaries are in comparison very superficial in their understanding.
Part of it is of course accessing the Holy Bible through translations that are woefully deficient. Even the best translation cannot transmit the content of the Hebrew.

Itzchak said...

For example:
This is from the Catholic Encyclopedia:
"Through the "Guide of the Perplexed" and the philosophical introductions to sections of his commentaries on the Mishna, Maimonides exerted a very important influence on the Scholastic philosophers, especially on Albert the Great, St. Thomas, and Duns Scotus"

Maurice Pinay said...

I have taught Jewish religious texts and thought to classes including priests, nuns and the like. They were/are often amazed ...

Whether what you claim here is true or not, I have no way of knowing. But it is consistent with what I have witnessed, namely rabbis running amok in Catholic schools, universities, seminaries, the Vatican, etc. But even centuries before this phenomenon came to be there were many gullible Christians who fell for the phony mystique of the rabbis as "masters of Old Testament scripture and the Hebrew language."

It's mostly the weak-minded and uneducated who fall for this nonsense and those whose vanity is exploited by rabbis with their offers to impart secret knowledge. That's what you're attempting, hawking Sefer Yezirah, a book which purports to impart the secrets of creation.

I'm not interested in your rabbinic fools gold.

Suffice to say that Johannes Eisenmenger was one of the foremost Hebraists of his time and he was not very impressed by the rabbis for their understanding of ancient Hebrew, much less their understanding of Biblical scripture. He was quite impressed, however, by the absurdity of their fables, their obsessive racism and their belief in transmigration among countless other examples of extreme rabbinic stupidity.

Itzchak said...

Are you purposely censoring my quote from the Catholic Encyclopedia?

Maurice Pinay said...

"... Maimonides exerted a very important influence on the Scholastic philosophers, especially on Albert the Great, St. Thomas, and Duns Scotus"

This is a bit enthusiastically overstated. St. Thomas quoted Maimonides in a few instances. St. Thomas found the Islamic philosopher, Avarroes' work to be of greater worth and he owed the most to the pagan philosopher, Aristotle, of course, as does Maimonides. As Maimonides said, "accept truth from whomever pronounces it."

Maimonides obviously couldn't identify truth very well which made it difficult for him to accept it, unfortunately. You won't find any endorsement from St. Thomas for Maimonides' racism, endorsement of slavery and usury, or his promotion of a two-tiered legal system preferential for "Jews" and with crushing burdens for non-"Jews."

You may want to read some of St. Thomas' philosophy, itzchak. It could help you to clear up your muddled thinking, I believe.

I know you think that you're performing tikkun here; raising the holy sparks from the kelipoth so that your ein soph can be reunited with his shekinah. But I have other things to do than play along with that silly game, so I'll be putting you on hold for a bit.

Itzchak said...

"raising the holy sparks from the kelipoth"
Not much hope in this case...if there are any sparks of holiness here, I can't discern them.

Anonymous said...

Itzchak

"raising the holy sparks from the kelipoth"
Not much hope in this case...if there are any sparks of holiness here, I can't discern them.

So holiness is what you discern? If this is the case than the case to be made has come from your own mouth.

Michael Mantra said...

AN INTERESTING ANECDOTE ABOUT THE 'CATHOLIC' LEAGUE...I LIVE IN PHILADELPHIA PA...ABOUT TWO WEEKS BEFOR CHRISTMAS I WAS RDING A BUS DOWN CHESTNUT STREET IN PHILADELP-
IA...INDEPENENCE HAL & THE NEW INDEPENDENCE MALL HISTORY CENTER ARE LOCATED AT 5TH & CHESTNUT...
WHILE RIDING PAST THE MALL, I SAW THAT A 35-F00T MENORAH HAD BEEN ERECTED OUTSIDE THE CENTER WHERE THE LIBERTY BELL WAS...SINCE IT WAS
CHRISTMAS & PHILADELPHIA IS PRIMARILY A CHRISTIAN/CATHOLIC CITY
I GOT OFF THE BUS & HAD A LOOK...
THE MENORAH STOOD IN THE VERY CENTER OF INDEPENDENCE MALL, TOWERING OVER EVERYTHING...THEN I
NOTICED, ABOUT 30-40 FEET TO THE LEFT OF IT, A SMALL & VERY UGLY CRECHE, OR NATIVITY SCENE...SO I
WENT IONTO THE HISTORICAL MUSEUM &
ASKED WHY THIS TOWERING MENORAH WAS
DOMINATING EVERYTHING ON THE MALL,
& THERE WAS ONLY A TINY CRECHE, OFF TO THE SIDE...WELL, ONE OF THE GUARDS SAID, 'WE'VE BEEN WONDERING
ABOUT THAT OURSELVES'...SO I GOT THE NAME OF THE PR PERSON FOR THE FEDERAL PARK SERVICE, WHICH MANAGES
THE INDEPENDENCE HALL COMPLEX...I
WENT TO SPEAK WITH HER, AND ADDRESSED THE ISSUE DIRECTLY...SHE
WAS A BIT TAKEN ABACK BY MY INQUIRY ABOUT THE GIANT MENORAH, BUT SHE ADVISED ME THAT FREEDOM OF
EXPRESSION WAS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, & THE MENORAH WAS PLACED THERE BY THE CHABBAD LUBAVITCH CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA, WHO APPARENTLY APPLIED FOR A PERMIT A
NUMBER OF MONTHS AGO & SO WERE ABLE TO ERECT THE GIANT MENORAH...I
THEN MENTIONED THE SMALL, UGLY CRECHE & ASKED WHAT CHRISTIAN ORGANIZATION APPLID FOR THAT PERMIT...SHE TOLD ME THE 'CATHOLIC
LEAGUE'...THEY ARE APPARENTLY NOT
AFFILIATED W/THE ARCHDIOCESE OF PHILA...IN FACT, THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE A PHILA PHONE NUMBER...SO I WENT ON THE INTERNET & GOT A PHONE
NUMBER FOR THE 'CATHOLIC LEAGUE' IN
NYC...I SPOKE TO YOUNG MAN FROM
THEIR PR DEPT, AND ASKED HIM WHY THE 'CATHOLIC LEAGUE' HAD PLACED THE UGLY CRECHE ON THE MALL, AND
WHY HADN'T THEY APPLIED FOR A PERMIT EARLIER LIKE THE LUBAVITCH-
ERS HAD DONE...HE WAS VERY EVASIVE W/ME & SAID HE DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHY THIS WAS AN ISSUE...OF COURSE
HE DIDN'T...I THOUGHT HE WAS GOING
TO ACCUSE ME OF 'ANTI-SEMITISM'...
THIS IS A REACTION TO THE WORDS OF
THE 'CATHOLIC LEAGUE' SPOKESMAN IN YOUR BLOG...WHO ARE THE 'CATHOLIC
LEAGUE'?

Bliss said...

Anonymous said (after quoting me):

"Itzchak
"raising the holy sparks from the kelipoth"
Not much hope in this case...if there are any sparks of holiness here, I can't discern them.

So holiness is what you discern? If this is the case than the case to be made has come from your own mouth."

Ummm...I'm sure you're an excellent reader but did you misread what I wrote?": What I wrote is that I don't discern any holiness here. Holiness and hate do not dwell together.

Maurice Pinay said...

"Holiness and hate do not dwell together."

I would agree that hatred of persons, rather than their behavior
and ideology, is not consistent with holiness. That's one of the many reasons why there is no holiness in Judaism--a religion which prescribes hatred and execution for anyone who doesn't submit to the tyranny of the rabbis.

What's more hateful than pulling up a ladder from a non-"Jew" who is in a pit leaving him to die as the author of your "holy" Shulchan Aruch instructs you to do? What's more hateful than watching a non-"Jew" drown without helping to save him as your "holy" sage, Maimonides instructs you to do?

What have you seen here that compares with "holy" acts of Judaic piety such as these?

Your Saint Baruch Goldstein exemplifies Judaic "holiness" perfectly. That's the religion of Judaism in practice.

Itzchak said...

"The chief rabbinate of Israel has ruled very explicitly that Shabbat must be violated for the purpose of saving any human life, be it Jewish or not. They phrased this ruling very carefully, because there is a belief among the more ignorant in the orthodox community that this is not the case."

And the more ignorant in the RC community as well...though I can't believe you're actually a part of the RC community in any official way.

The question below is dealing with situations on the Sabbath, when someone's death is certain regardless of what efforts one can do.
Your extremely superficial "use" of certain statements in Halacha show total ignorance of the totality of Jewish law.

One day, when I have more time, I'll be happy to share with you the multitudinous quotes and rulings that show the reverence for all life that Judaism teaches.
But preparation for Passover beckons and I must prepare for the Seders in which Jews and non Jews will be joyously celebrating freedom.
And I'm sure many of them will be RC's celebrating the freedom from the oppressive hateful mentality that you guys promote.
Liberation from your silly church and the power it once wielded is one of the great blessings of our time.

Maurice Pinay said...

"The chief rabbinate of Israel has ruled very explicitly that Shabbat must be violated for the purpose of saving any human life ...

First of all, I haven't addressed the Sabbath laws. You've introduced a red herring, as dissembling rabbis are often wont to do.

Secondly, you've dodged specific references to Halacha which most certainly constitute hatred towards non-"Jews," namely, either killing them indirectly or not saving their lives when it's possible to do so. There is no way around this codified Judaic law. That's why you avoid addressing it:

"Accordingly, if we see an idolater (gentile) being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him. If we see that his life is in danger, we should not save him." (Maimonides, Mishnah Torah, Moznaim Publishing Corporation, Brooklyn, New York, 1990, Chapter 10, English Translation, p. 184)

"Your extremely superficial "use" of certain statements in Halacha show total ignorance of the totality of Jewish law.

Your intellectual dishonesty shows your adherence to Talmud, specifically Baba Kamma 113a which allows you to use subterfuge to circumvent a non-"Jew."

One day, when I have more time, I'll be happy to share with you the multitudinous quotes and rulings that show the reverence for all life that Judaism teaches.

... which is intended for goy consumption, or the reformed who seek to distance themselves from the depravity of Orthodox Judaism, but not it's racial conceit.

And I'll respond with the true halachic rulings and opinions of authoritative rabbis which prove you a liar.

But preparation for Passover beckons and I must prepare for the Seders in which Jews and non Jews will be joyously celebrating freedom. And I'm sure many of them will be RC's ...

Self serving Judaizing, plain and simple. And non-"Jews" are losing their freedoms by the minute. The ones celebrating their "freedom" at seders are woefully ignorant of that fact.

Liberation from your silly church and the power it once wielded is one of the great blessings of our time.

Yes, the people who are languishing in dungeons for not submitting their will to the dictates of the Holocaust lobby would most certainly agree, I'm sure.

As Jesus Christ would say, Hypocrite!

Itzchak said...

Sigh...
the discussions about saving/not saving a life is always about this situation and Shabbat.
Otherwise, there is no question.

Itzchak said...

Of course, we know that the RC Church has been very tolerant, loving and forgiving towards heretics of all sorts throughout its history in power.

Maurice Pinay said...

" ... the discussions about saving/not saving a life is always about this situation and Shabbat.
Otherwise, there is no question."


Patent nonsense.

Maimonides states that all non-"Jews" who do not submit to Noahide law are to be killed (Maimonides puts this in the mouth of Moses who never heard of any "Noahide laws") Hilkhot Melakhim 8:10. This has nothing at all to do with Sabbath laws. That objection is plain rabbinic subterfuge in keeping with Baba Kamma 113a.

Melakhim 8:10 is the basis for allowing an "idolater" who's life is in danger to perish. The reason for not just killing the "idolater" outright in that case is due to Maimonides distinguishing between times and places of Judaic dominance, and times and places of Judaic subjugation.

In times and places where Judaics are not in a ruling position Maimonides instructs them to be circumspect in how they go about causing non-"Jews" to "descend to the pit of destruction." He even says that they should attempt to save the life of a non-"Jew" if not doing so would cause troubles for the Jews. This is why the chief rabbis ruled that the Judaic doctors should not refrain from saving the life of a non-"Jew" on the Sabbath. The negative attention drawn by the Israeli doctors who refused to treat dying Palestinians could cause people to think poorly of Judaics. That is why they changed the ruling. They followed the provisions laid out by Maimonides.

But if Judaic power is consolidated, that ruling would go out the window and non-Judaic "idolaters" would be killed as a mitzvah if Maimonides is taken at his racist, tyrannical word.

Maurice Pinay said...

Of course, we know that the RC Church has been very tolerant, loving and forgiving towards heretics of all sorts throughout its history in power.

What would you like me to do about what happened hundreds of years ago? I readily admit that there were abuses of power by Church members, even though they are wildly exaggerated by the Judaic view. But I hasten to make the distinction that the abuses are contrary to Christian morality.

Any similar abuses of power by Judaic authority is in complete keeping with Judaic "morality."

Your people are the tyrants today, and you haven't a single thing to say against it. You only attempt to cover it up and shift the blame. You're a hypocrite.

Itzchak said...

"But if Judaic power is consolidated, that ruling would go out the window and non-Judaic "idolaters" would be killed as a mitzvah if Maimonides is taken at his racist, tyrannical word....
Your people are the tyrants today"

And yet, for some unexplainable reason, we "Judaics" are not going around killing "non Judaic idolators"...hmmm maybe that's not what we understand Maimnonides to be saying.
-to be continued.

"Judaics" in power are not going around killing "non Judaics".

Maurice Pinay said...

"Judaics" in power are not going around killing "non Judaics".

Many of them are, in Palestine and Lebanon recently. The Judaics who pull G.W. Bush's strings are using the the U.S. military to kill non-Judaics in Iraq, and if they have their way, in Iran also.

And Judaic power is not consolidated-- there; is no temple in Jerusalem; the Sanhedrin has not yet asserted it's authority in full; there is no "Jewish" king. If, God forbid, these things come to be, that is when Maimonides' laws regarding non-Judaics would be put into practice and non-Judaics would be killed in even larger numbers.

Itzchak said...

Wow...your simplistic understanding is sometimes astounding.
The people dying in Lebanon and elsewhere in the Middle East are dying because they're non "Judaics"...and that's why the people in Iraq are dying???!!!

Are you capable of any thinking outside of this narrow insane frame?

Anonymous said...

itzchak, are you capable of going outside your box of "Jewish righteousness"?

Anonymous said...

BTW, itzchak, whether you deny it or not, the Talmud is racist and blasphemous toward Christianity. No wonder you hold Jesus in contempt.

Itzchak said...

Please understand that I don't hold "Jesus" in contempt because of the Talmud. There are many other reasons which I'd be happy to enumerate again if asked.