Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Judaic "Redemption" Comes Through Extermination of "Amalek"

Redemption is no more than the external manifestation of the inner state of tikkun ("restitution") which depends on the deeds of Israel and a realization of the way of life which the Kabbalah preaches. The fact of tikkun is not something which depends on a miracle, but rather on human action ... [the Messiah's] coming is conditional upon the accomplishment of the task of Israel in the "tikkun of the world." According to this latter view, there is a human and historical preparation for redemption and the Messiah will come automatically if this preparation is completed. This belief is widespread among the disciples of Isaac Luria, and it follows logically from the basic assumptions of Lurianic Kabbalah. (Encyclopedia Judaica, "Redemption")

The main concern of Lurianic Kabbalah, as has been mentioned, is with the details of the process of tikkun ... certain concluding actions have been reserved for man. These are the ultimate aim of creation, and the completion of tikkun, which is synonymous with the redemption, depends on man's performing them. (Encyclopedia Judaica, "Kabbalah")

Now that we know that Kabbalism maintains that Judaics themselves bring about their own redemption (laying bare the self-worship of Judaism), it's interesting to note what conditions must be fulfilled according to Kabbalah in order for "redemption" to take place:

"But withal redemption will not be complete until Amalek will be exterminated, for against Amalek the oath was taken that “the Lord will have war against Amalek from generation to generation” (Ex. XVII,16). (Soncino Zohar, Bereshith, Folio 25b)

As a side note, Daniel Matt's recently published English translation of the Zohar has omitted this genocidal prophesy completely without even a footnote explaining it's absence. I can't imagine why. In fact, folios 22b through 29a are completely missing. It must have been the Christian censors! Ha! I shall be interested to see if Matt censors Zohar III 282a (which places Jesus next to Muhammad amid worms, dung, dead dogs and assess) from a forthcoming volume of his English translated Zohar.

Benedict XVI says that Judaic anticipation of "the Messiah" is not in vain. For the good of all of those unfortunate to be categorized as "Amalek" by the rabbis I wish that he would cease encouraging those psychopaths.

And for all of those who have been duped into accepting the Neturei Karta, Satmar and other anti-Zionist "Torah-true" Hasidim as allies, I would let you in on the fact that the Zohar quoted above is the "Torah" that they are true to.


Joseph D'Hippolito said...

Well, Mo, I guess you just plum forgot about the fact that God also ordered Saul to obliterate the Amalekites in I Samuel (in fact, Samuel the prophet was God's means to deliver this message), down to their flocks and herds! Saul disobeyed (choosing instead to keep the best of the livestock for himself and his men) and, as a result, God abandoned him as Israel's king.

Now, why do you suppose God ordered such an act. Simple: The Messiah was to come out of the Israelites; any extermination of that people would prevent Messiah from coming. Moreover, any such extermination would be an act against God. Therefore, God was judging the Amalekites as a people.

Now, you may say, "That was then; this is now." Well, the descendents of the Amalekites, the Arab Muslims, aren't all that different. They wish to destroy anything and anyone -- Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, atheist -- to establish their "Caliphate" and either force conversions to Islam or enslave and murder those who don't. What do you think dhimmmitude was and is all about?

Yet you never address such subjects, Mo. You engage in mental masturbation about a past that has little bearing on today's events. Why? Is your wacked-out agenda so much more important than the lives of innocent people? Does not God demand that we protect the widow and the orphan, who are the epitome of the innocent and vulnerable? If that's true, then what about other innocent people who are not quite as vulnerable?

Perhaps you will change your mind once al-Qaeda assassinates the Pope, blows up St. Peter's or turns it into a mosque. But by then, Mo, it will be too late, and everybody will see you as the fool that you are.

Finally, please don't bother to pray to me. Since you obviously pray to Satan, I'll decline your "charity."

Maurice Pinay said...

Now, you may say, "That was then; this is now." Well, the descendents of the Amalekites, the Arab Muslims, aren't all that different. They wish to destroy anything and anyone ...

You poor, dangerous fool. Your warped perception of Scripture is more frightening than that of John Hagee. Amalek has no descendants. There has been no Amalek for thousands of years.


"David pursued and overtook the [Amalecites] in the midst of feast and revel, recovered all the spoil and captives, and slew all the Amalecites except 400 young men who escaped on camels. This slaughter broke the power of the Amalecites and drove them back to their desert home; there a miserable remnant of them lingered on till the days of Ezechias, tenth successor of David, when a band of 500 Simeonites sufficed to exterminate, to the last man, Israel's fiercest foe [Amalek](1 Chronicles 4:42, 43).



Amalek exists today only in the sick minds of genocidal rabbis and their deluded followers and Noahide "Christians" such as yourself.

Many prayers will be needed for your conversion.

Joseph D'Hippolito said...

Well, Mo, even if the Amalekites no longer exist, the Arab Muslims more than take their place. One doesn't have to be a "Noahide" Christian with "Judaic" tendencies to believe this. All one has to do is follow the trail of blood: the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, Pennsylvania, Bali, Madrid, London, Beslan, Istanbul...need I go on?

Of course, you actively support these satanic bastards because they serve your agenda. You fail to address the necessity of Lepanto, without which Europe would have become effectively Muslim.

Of course, you don't care if Europe (or the world) becomes Muslim because you care not one whit about Christ's redemptive mission, His shed blood for the salvation of humanity. All you care about is your disgust for what the "Jews" are doing to your "Church" -- a church, might I add, that abandoned the Gospel a long time ago in favor of power, prestige, wealth and influence.

BTW, as long as you're praying for me, please tell me what kind of small animals you sacrifice to your god? Inquiring minds want to know...

Maurice Pinay said...

Well, Mo, even if the Amalekites no longer exist ...

I guess you're the type that makes it up as he goes along. Very impressive. How people with no understanding of a topic have come to believe they have a right to express an opinion on that topic is the strangest phenomenon of recent times.

If your mega-million dollar contract Noahide pals, Hannity and Limbaugh and the media behemoth that broadcasts their hot air worldwide took a break from their crusade against Muslims and did some honest reporting on the Zionist threat to the U.S. and the rabbinic threat to the Catholic Church it wouldn't be left to little old me to spend whatever time I have left in my life after work and no budget to pick up their slack. But you expect me to join them and the rest of the media behemoth and Zionist shills posing as U.S. politicians in blaring the message of the Muslim threat, real and imaginary?

You're a crazy person with no sense of proportion. You expect me to drop what I'm doing which no major media organization is doing and put my efforts towards what every media organ and nearly every U.S. politician is already doing? Your insane, unreasonable, disproportionate expectations smack of chutzpah.

If you want reporting on the Muslim threat, real and imagined, listen to a George Bush press conference, turn on Fox News. They'll give you what you want 24-7. The media channels are completely saturated with that message.

"Muslim threat" indeed. I will tell you this, if Europeans upheld their Christian traditions and had children instead of aborting and contracepting them there would be no Muslim threat in Europe. Muslims can't be held responsible for creating the void in Europe that Muslims, who uphold their traditions and have large families, are filling.

Furthermore, your demands are arrogant, ignorant and devoid of any concept of respect. You must be out of your mind if you think I'd change my agenda in response to your ignorant polemics and empty insults.

I will continue to pray for you but I will no longer publish your idiotic rants. This is a one-man operation. I barely have the time for research. I will not compromise it with babysitting the brain-dead.

Anonymous said...

Thank you, Maurice! Please, keep up the good work. I really appreciate what you said about abortion and contraception. May God bless you.

M.J. said...

As Republican candidate Ron Paul points out, the Muslim world does not hate America because of its Western ideals, it hates us because we have strayed from them in supporting Israeli oppression against the Palestinians. First they stole their land then they wall them up and we simply turn a blind eye. Don't know about you, but I'd be pretty angry too.

"The CIA speaks of something called 'blowback'..."

MaryC said...

I realize that this is a very old post, but I would still like to put in my tuppence ha'penny.
I don't know if Mr D'Hippolito has modified his views in any way, but back in the day he was in receipt of the shekel by writing columns for the 'Jerusalem Post', which is/was edited by neocon, 'ex'-trotskyite, David Horowitz.
He also used to contribute to a neo-Catholic blog, one of his posts claiming that Catholics tended to show too much devotion to Mary. Perhaps he would prefer that we took the same view of her that his beloved Talmudists do: that she was a Jewish hairdresser who played the whore with Roman soldiers.