Friday, June 12, 2009

James von Brunn: The Shimon ben Yohai of "The White Race, " and His Contribution to Holocaustolatry

Manchurian candidate, James von Brunn has prepared the altar. Now comes the procession of bishops to incense the idol of Holocaustolatry, once again. The liturgical season of "The Holocaust" never ends.

James von Brunn, like the rabbis, is an anti-Christian racial determinist. He's mentally programmed to behave in an anti-Christian rabbinic manner. Like the rabbis, who teach that "Amalek" is a genetically programmed enemy of "The Jews" and cannot be reasoned with and therefore must be killed, HERE, HERE, and HERE, so does James von Brunn believe that "The Jews" are genetically programmed enemies of "The White Race" and cannot be reasoned with and therefore must be killed, HERE (scroll to bottom). In essence, there is no difference between James von Brunn and Rabbi Shimon ben Yohai who he paraphrased in the title of his book, Kill the Best Gentiles. But one of these race haters is sainted while the other will live in infamy in accordance with the crazy double-standards of this crazy, racist world, which the bishops honor above all.

And here is Cardinal George sanctifying the "hallowed space" of the U.S. Holocaust Museum and calling for more "education" against every kind of bias (except pro-Judaic bias, of course). No, Cardinal George, the world needs the Gospel, the teachings of Jesus Christ which your elder brothers are attempting to destroy with their "education" and Holocaustolatry.

Cardinal calls shooting at US Holocaust museum 'appalling'

Friday 12 June 2009

WASHINGTON (CNS) - The president of the United States bishops' conference called the June 10 shooting at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum that left a security guard dead "appalling".

James von Brunn, identified as an 88-year-old Holocaust denier and white supremacist, opened fire in the Washington museum and fatally shot guard Stephen Johns, 39, according to The Associated Press.

The shooting "was a deplorable act of violence and a violation of a hallowed space in our nation's capital," said Cardinal Francis E. George of Chicago in a statement released June 11 by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in Washington.

"This tragic incident only serves to reinforce the need for continued education throughout society against bias of every kind, but most especially racial and religious prejudice," he said.

In a separate statement Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl of Washington said June 11 the murder was "particularly distressing given the museum's special mission to educate our world about violence and be a living reminder of the harm that comes from hatred and anger."

"It is our prayer that Mr. Johns rest in God's eternal embrace and that this loss be a call to each of us for a renewed commitment to building a world of peace and respect for all people," Archbishop Wuerl said.

The archdiocese collaborates with the museum, the bishops' conference and other groups each year to train Catholic school educators to teach their students about anti-Semitism, the Holocaust, prejudice and Catholic-Jewish relations.

In his statement Cardinal George said that that "by preserving the memory of the 6 million Jews who died in the Shoah, the museum speaks to the consciences of all who pass through its doors and hear the powerful stories of the innocent men, women and children who lost their lives at the hands of a criminal regime."

He noted that annually millions of the visitors to the museum "learn of the dangers of unchecked hatred and of the need to prevent genocide wherever it threatens."

The cardinal, on behalf of the U.S. bishops, offered condolences to the Johns family and said the Catholic leaders are "committed to promoting human dignity and interreligious peace throughout our nation."

"We echo the words of Pope Benedict XVI: 'May the Shoah be a warning for all against forgetfulness, denial or reductionism, because violence committed against one single human being is violence against all,'" he said.


Anonymous said...

I'm at a loss for words.

Anonymous said...

Query as to what these same dear wolves in sheep's clothing were saying on February 25, 1994 and the days following regarding the Talmudic holy man (and physician no less!) Baruch Goldstein.

James B. Phillips

P.S. Our current cast of bishops' patron saint is the Pillsbury Dough Boy. They love the dough (and the $$$ too) and they have a nice little poem for us:

Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
We are your bishops,
Ha, ha, ha.

Anonymous said...

James, that doesn't rhyme. Allow me to try:

Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
We are your bishops,
The joke is on you!

Anonymous said...

You are wrong.

Before James von Brunn, the Good Lord Himself proved with His own life that Jews cannot be reasoned with.

Would you therefore conclude that there is no difference between Jesus of Nazareth and Rabbi Shimon ben Yohai?

Anonymous said...

You're antisemitic, just like the Rabbi's said happened in another recent case! We need the Rabbi's next to come forward and defend the museum from antisemitism.

"More than 125 rabbis from across the denominations of Judaism have signed a letter that will be sent Tuesday to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. The letter asks the Attorney General to review the recent prosecution of two former employees of AIPAC, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman."

I'm sure you will not post this.

Anonymous said...

If you do not post my last comment because you believe it is unrelated, here is more direct proof you are being antisemitic:

"In Washington, the white supremacist von Brunn apparently skirted such tripwires by using a vintage rifle from the early 20th century. With that single, small-caliber gun, a museum security guard was killed before other guards opened fire and disabled von Brunn.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks white supremacists, says the number of hate groups in the United States has risen 54 percent since 2000, fueled by opposition to Hispanic immigration and, more recently, by the election of the nation's first black president and the economic downturn.

"Today the vast majority of domestic terrorist attacks are in fact lone wolf or so-called leaderless resistance attacks," said the center's Mark Potok. "There are very few ways to prevent them ... short of assigning a police officer to every person in America."

The number of angry white men in America is getting larger, said Chip Berlet, senior analyst with Political Research Associates in Somerville, Mass., a think tank that studies right-wing extremists.

In particular, the heterosexual, white, Christian men in America feel they've been pushed out of the way, Berlet said. Attacking the Holocaust Museum is a no-brainer, he said, because white supremacists blame Jews for the advancement of black people.

"The idea that blacks are put in positions of power by crafty Jews is central to their conspiracy theory," Berlet said.

Other experts contend the white supremacist climate has not changed much over the years."

Anonymous said...

There are no "angry white men" any longer, statistically and demographically speaking; they've been aborted out of existence. There is, however, an angry black male phenomenon. There are many black leaders who objectively know that the civil rights movement was dramatically hindered (if not completely derailed) by the immigration reform act. Jobs that would have gone to blacks have been given either to illegal Indians (or other H-1B visa recipients) or illegal Mexicans. It's rather ironic that non-whites in both the white-collar world and the blue-collar world have displaced blacks from critically necessary employment opportunities. Black leadership is looking very closely at those responsible for this displacement -- and the blacks have determined that it's not the whites doing the displacing or oppressing. And let's just say that heterosexual, Christian blacks know they've been pushed out of the way -- and they know it's NOT by the whites they're sharing the unemployment lines with.

Anonymous said...

Yawn. Another attacker of traditional Catholicism and of those questioning the story of the Holocaust. What is this "anti-Semitism" that the owner of the blog holds?

Your "proofs" are very lacking! You really have no idea what you're talking about. You're parroting nonsense from the media, who are liars! How sad for you to be taken in by all the garbage it spouts to you!

The blogger posted your responses, to show the utter ridiculous nature of your "proofs"! And it is not to be wondered at, since you're siding with the rabbis, lying about what true Christianity is about.

As for the other blogger claiming Jews can't be reasoned with, Our Lord was crucified by the Jewish mob and leaders, BUT NOT ALL THE JEWS! Not all the Jews rejected Christ. He knew all men, but how are we to know all Jews can't be reasoned with? We must seek their sincere conversion (unlike false conversions of the Marranos, etc.).

Anonymous said...

JUNE 16, 2009...9:24 AM

Proof: Israeli Effort to Destabilize Iran Via Twitter

By chartingstocks

Right-wing Israeli interests are engaged in an all out Twitter attack with hopes of delegitimizing the Iranian election and causing political instability within Iran.

Anyone using Twitter over the past few days knows that the topic of the Iranian election has been the most popular. Thousands of tweets and retweets alleging that the election was a fraud, calling for protests in Iran, and even urging followers hack various Iranian news websites (which they did successfully). The Twitter popularity caught the eye of various blogs such as Mashable and TechCrunch and even made its way to mainstream news media sites.

Were these legitimate Iranian people or the works of a propaganda machine? I became curious and decided to investigate the origins of the information. In doing so, I narrowed it down to a handful of people who have accounted for 30,000 Iran related tweets in the past few days. Each of them had some striking similarities -

1. They each created their twitter accounts on Saturday June 13th.
2. Each had extremely high number of Tweets since creating their profiles.
3. “IranElection” was each of their most popular keyword
4. With some very small exceptions, each were posting in ENGLISH.
5. Half of them had the exact same profile photo
6. Each had thousands of followers, with only a few friends. Most of their friends were EACH OTHER.

Why were these tweets in English? Why were all of these profiles OBSESSED with Iran? It became obvious that this was the work of a team of people with an interest in destabilizing Iran. The profiles are phonies and were created with the sole intention of destabilizing Iran and effecting public opinion as to the legitimacy of Iran’s election.

I narrowed the spammers down to three of the most persistent – @StopAhmadi @IranRiggedElect @Change_For_Iran

I decided to do a google search for 2 of the 3 – @StopAhmadi and @IranRiggedElect. The first page to come up was JPost (Jerusalem Post) which is a right wing newspaper pro-Israeli newspaper.

JPost actually ran a story about 3 people “who joined the social network mere hours ago have already amassed thousands of followers.” Why would a news organization post a story about 3 people who JUST JOINED TWITTER hours earlier? Is that newsworthy? Jpost was the first (and only to my knowledge) major news source that mentioned these 3 spammers.

The fact that JPost promoted these three Twitterers who went on the be the source of the IranElection Twitter bombardment is, unfortunately, evidence that this was an Israeli propaganda campaign against Iran. I must admit that I had my suspiscions. After all, Que Bono? (latin for “Who Benefits). There’s no question that Israel perceives Iran as an enemy, more so than any other nation. Destabilizing the country would benefit them.