Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Chabad Rabbi Preaches Talmudic 'Noahide Laws' to Congress Again

Naturally, this is unremarkable to the Kosher-conservative commentators who hysterically warn of an 'imminent threat' of Islamic Sharia law coming to our shores.

Thomas Jefferson in his letter to John Adams of October 12, 1813 contrasted rabbinism harshly against the teachings of Jesus identifying it as a system of wretched depravity. He must be rolling in his grave. What a pit of wretched, rabbinic depravity this once great nation has become.


Anonymous said...

Jefferson was a deist - about as non-Catholic as they get. Any integration of Catholicism into mainstream American life would have him in fits. He also does not mention "rabbi" or "rabbinism" at any point in the linked-to documents. He also expresses profuse admiration for Spinosa, the medieval Jewish philosopher.
Also, the Noahide laws I hear the rabbi mention in the youtube video are that societies should be governed by just laws and that they should obey the one God. What on earth is the matter with that??
Much ado about nothing, I say.

Maurice Pinay said...

Thomas Jefferson regarded Jesus Christs' teachings as the highest philosophy. His political philosophy drew heavily from St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Thomas. see here:


Jefferson regarded Judaism as "wretched depravity." see here:


Chabad leader Rebbe Schneerson taught that Christianity is a form a mental illness.

see here:


Chabad teaches that "Yoshke" (Jesus Christ) was a bastard who practiced magic, worshiped a brick, led Israel astray, deserved to be executed and is now being punished in hell in boiling excrement. Chabad Judaism is as anti-Catholic as it gets.

The lying Chabad rabbi in the attached video may say "societies should be governed by just laws" but in fact he is attempting to bring societies under the most absurdly unjust system of laws ever concocted: the Talmudic 'Noahide Laws.' I give you but one example of how the 'Noahide Law' system of double-standards is absurdly preferential to 'Jews' and tyrannical towards everyone else from the Babylonian Talmud:

"A non-Jew is put to death on the basis of a decision given by one judge [no jury], and on the basis of testimony given by a single witness, and even if he was not given a proper warning prior to the commission of his offense. He is put to death on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a man but not on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a woman, and the man who testified or decided against him can even be a relative.

"A Jew can only be put to death by a court of twenty-three judges, and on the basis of the testimony of two male witnesses who are not disqualified from testifying on account of kinship, and after being properly warned against committing the transgression. But none of these rules apply in the case of a non-Jew."
(Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 57b, Steinsaltz edition, vol.18, page 110)

Maurice Pinay said...

"As commentaries too on these, the philosophy of the Hebrews must be enquired into, their Mishna, their Gemara, Cabbala, Jezirah, Sohar, Cosri, and their Talmud must be examined and understood, in order to do them full justice. [Jacob] Brucker, it should seem, has gone deeply into these Repositories of their ethics, and Enfield, his epitomiser, concludes in these words. `Ethics were so little studied among the Jews, that, in their whole compilation called the Talmud, there is only one treatise on moral subjects. Their books of Morals chiefly consisted in a minute enumeration of duties. From the law of Moses were deduced 613. precepts, which were divided into two classes, affirmative and negative, 248 in the former, and 365 in the latter. It may serve to give the reader some idea of the low state of moral philosophy among the Jews in the Middle age, to add, that of the 248. affirmative precepts, only 3. were considered as obligatory upon women; and that, in order to obtain salvation, it was judged sufficient to fulfill any one single law in the hour of death; the observance of the rest being deemed necessary, only to increase the felicity of the future life. What a wretched depravity of sentiment and manners must have prevailed before such corrupt maxims could have obtained credit! It is impossible to collect from these writings a consistent series of moral Doctrine.' (Enfield, B. 4. chap. 3). It was the reformation of this `wretched depravity' of morals which Jesus undertook." (Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams of October 12, 1813)


Anonymous said...

"Chabad leader Rebbe Schneerson taught that Christianity is a form a mental illness."

My respect for hims just grew immensely.

Anonymous said...

Could it be that just as Christianity is the religion derived of the teachings of Christ, so might the religion "Judaism" as a religion and practice, be derived of the teachings of one Judas Iscariot. The Judaics are renowed for their propensity to betrayal.

In the Christian narratives that included the works of the Judas, just who is demonstrably mentally ill and eminently purchaseable for a pitiable compensation ?. Apparently the Christ envied the Judas, or so they would have us believe.

Anonymous said...

THIS IS RIDICULOUS____ Judaism SAYs SO MANYYYYYYYY BAD THINGS ABOUT Jesus and his teachings yet -- WE have Chabad Rabbi's going up the gongress. I seriously dont comprehand this AT ALLLLLLLL..

CHABAD LOOKS AT CHRISTIANS AS IDOLATERS--and believe me when i say they will not lift a finger to HELP you even if your drowning. IT IS AGAINST THERE LAW TO HELP YOU..

I dont understand WTH is going on and how people allow such things.