Monday, April 28, 2014

Rabbinic Judaism's Doctrine of Justification for African Slave Trade

What People Should be Learning from the Donald Tokowitz "Sterling" Scandal

I've often commented that the rabbis and machers are perilously close to being trampled by the anti-European-Christian golems they create through culture shaping and population transfer. We're seeing this happen this week with Donald Tokowitz "Sterling's" traditional Judaic bigoted comments being made public. But there's a lot of Judaic establishment framework still in place preventing clear thinking on the matter.

At Mondoweiss, the Judeo-supremacist anti-Zionist outfit, commenters are spinning in circles of pilpul as to whether it's permissible to identify Tokowitz as a Zionist. The more 'progressive' Judeo-supremacists and their goy sidekicks chomp at the bit to claim modern Zionism as the explanation for Tokowitz' bigotry as if he learned it from Theodore Herzl.

But not one will address the obvious fact that is, practically speaking, kicking them in the head; Tokowitz' recent descent from the anti-goyite, anti-black, Judeo-supremacist religious/cultural community (likely Russia, Poland and/or Eastern Germany) governed by the canonized texts of rabbinic Judaism which authoritatively teach that black skin is a curse of servitude and that Ham's progeny was cursed with dark skin because, inter alia, he had sex with a dog. There's the proper context for understanding Tokowitz' statement of black skinned people that "in 'Israel' these people are treated like dogs." It's true, in Counterfeit Israel, one nation under the counterfeit holy texts of the Talmud, which teach that black skin exists because Ham had sex with a dog; in Counterfeit Israel black skinned people are indeed treated like dogs. What else would one expect from a community laboring for centuries under such hateful, bigoted religious delusion with only recent strained pretentions to enlightenment from it.

These people are covering up the truth just as Tokowitz attempted to cover up his anti-goyite Judeo-supremacism and predation with the comically disarming surname, "Sterling"!

One hopes and prays that truth seeking black people will come to understand how the anti-black religion of rabbinic Judaism has been the source of anti-black oppression and hatred from Sephardic Judaic slave traders of the past to Ashkenazic Judaic NBA team owners of today, and how these hate mongers have divided and ruled by creating strife between white and black common people.

Friday, April 25, 2014

Pope of Holocaustianity to be Canonized Saint of Holocaustianity on High Holy Day of Holocaustianity, "Yom Hashoah"

JPII will be canonized a saint of the 'Noahide' church of Holocaustianity on the High Holy day of Holocaustianity, Yom Hashoah, April 27, 2014. Yom Hashoah, a High Holy day of Israeli origin, now observed internationally, is the day when the Judeomasonic establishment prostrates itself before 'The Holocaust' much more than it does every other day of the year.

This Yom Hashoah canonization date is very fitting. One of JPII's first public papal acts was to prostrate himself at 'The Death Wall' at Auschwitz and then proclaim, "I kneel at this Golgotha of the modern world."

'Noahide' Pope Saint John Paul II kneeling at "The Death Wall" at Auschwitz, June 1, 1979

"Auschwitz, along with so many other concentration camps, remains the horribly eloquent symbol of the effects of totalitarianism. It is our duty to make a pilgrimage to these places, in mind and heart, on this 50th anniversary. As I said at the Mass celebrated in 1979 at Brzezinka near Auschwitz: 'I kneel at this Golgotha of the modern world.'"(Message of John Paul II on 50th Anniversary of the end of WWII in Europe, May 8, 1995)

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Swine unto the Nations

Israeli settlers release wild pigs on Palestinian farms

IMEMC 21 Apr by Chris Carlson — Palestinian farmers in the Salfit district appealed all to Palestinian and international bodies to stop the continued destruction of their crops caused by the Israeli pigs [wild boars] in the district. Farmers said, “We have encountered heavy losses in our wheat and barley crops, where the pigs destroyed them completely.” They added, “We tried to get rid of the pigs with all available ways but we have failed,” pointing out that the only way is to shoot them; which is difficult due to the miltary’s monitoring towers and checkpoints in the area. Furthermore, according to Al Ray, Palestinian researcher Khaled Maali explained that the settlers found launching wild pigs toward the Palestinian farmlands was the best effective way to fight the Palestinian farmers without significant cost. Maali pointed out that the occupation prevents the Palestinians from shooting the pigs, whereas it permits settlers to kill the pigs when they reach their colonial settlements.
Also see:

A Sewer Unto the Nations: Israeli 'settlers' pump sewage onto Palestinian farm land

Saturday, April 19, 2014

The Religion of Orthodox Judaism Exonerates the Romans, Claims Full Responsibility for the Execution of Jesus

On Passover Eve they hanged Jesus of Nazareth. And the herald went out before him for forty days: 'Jesus of Nazareth is going out to be stoned because he practiced sorcery, incited [to idol worship] and led Israel astray. Whoever knows an argument in his favor should come and argue on his behalf.' But they did not find an argument in his favor, and they hanged him on Passover Eve ... Jesus ... had close connections with the non-Jewish authorities, and those authorities were interested in his acquittal. Thus it was necessary to give him all the opportunity to clear himself, so that the justice of his conviction not be challenged ... Was Jesus of Nazareth deserving of a search for an argument in his favor? He was an inciter, and the Torah (lit., "the Merciful") says: "You shall not spare, nor shall you conceal him"! (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 43a, Steinsaltz edition, Vol XVII, Part III)

... the Talmud is here offering a subtle commentary upon Jesus' political connections. The Gospels portray the Roman governor Pontius Pilate as going to great lengths to spare Jesus (Mark 15: 6-15) … the Talmudic passage points in the same direction ...

... the passage suggests rabbinic willingness to take responsibility for the execution of Jesus. No effort is made to pin his death upon the Romans. In all likelihood, the passage in question emanates from fourth-century Babylon, then the center of Talmudic scholarship, and beyond the reach of both Rome and Christianity. Although several hundred years had elapsed since the lifetime of Jesus, and therefore this is not at all a contemporary source, the Talmudic passage indicates rabbinic willingness to acknowledge, at least in principle, that in a Jewish court and in a Jewish land, a real-life Jesus would indeed have been executed ... ("Jesus in the Talmud," Steven Bayme, American Jewish Committee National Director, September 24, 2003)

The very fact that the Talmud's claim of Jesus' closeness to the Roman government reflects some knowledge ... of the New Testament narrative, particularly of of John's version of it ... this detail exonerates the Roman government from the blame of Jesus' condemnation and consequently, adopting the Gospels' message, puts the thrust of the accusation on the Jews ... What we then have here in the [Babylonian Talmud] is a powerful confirmation of the New Testament Passion narrative, a creative rereading, however, that not only knows some of its distinct details but proudly proclaims Jewish responsibility of Jesus' execution. (Jesus in the Talmud, Peter Schafer, Princeton University Press, pp.73-74)

Also see:

The Crucifixion Narrative for Goys vs. the Crucifixion Narrative Which the Rabbis Maintain Amongst Themselves

The Judaic Propensity to Have It Both Ways

Bad Advice From the Pope

"We Killed Jesus, And We'll Kill You Too"

Francis and His Brother Pharisees Joke about "the last lunch"

Please see:

The Last Lunch

Friday, April 18, 2014

Victimization of "Jews" takes center stage on Good Friday

Bill O’Reilly’s Midrash on Jesus

PDF File 
Bill O’Reilly’s Midrash on Jesus  

by Michael Hoffman. 19 pages. 7,000 words. $5.50

Michael Hoffman’s Notes on 
O’Reilly's The Last Days of Jesus: His Life and Times 
A Special Illustrated Edition of Killing Jesus

 "The modern world conspires to qualify, modify and mitigate, like a shyster lawyer, the guilt of the founders of the religion of rabbinic Judaism for the death of the Son of God. In Bill O’Reilly, as evidenced by this subversive and disgraceful book, Judaism has found another such shyster.” — Michael Hoffman 

Hoffman analyzes the flaws in The Last Days of Jesus, in the course of which he demolishes many of the standard propaganda ploys of all those who attempt to shift the blame for the Crucifixion of Christ from the Pharisees, Scribes and Sadducees on to the Romans and Pontius Pilate.

Order the PDF file of Michael Hoffman's essay, "Bill O’Reilly’s Midrash on Jesus," here:

Monday, April 14, 2014

Leaven-burning Brooklyn Rebbe Calls NYC Firemen "Nazis"

Video: Sanz-Klausenberg Rebbe Equates NYC Firemen With Nazis

It is the tradition of Orthodox Judaism to meticulously clean all leaven from the home and burn it in the hopes that so doing will make 'The Jews' worthy that their "Messiah' will smash 'Esau'(Christiandom). It's become customary in recent times for the popes and bishops to send these anti-Christ, racial supremacist, hate-religion leaders warm greetings on their hate holiday of rabbinic Passover.

Please see:

This Evening the "Elder Brothers" Cleanse their Homes of Leaven, Hopeful for our Annihilation

The Passover Cover Story For Goys vs. The Real Deal

Benedict Meets in Cabal with the Pharisees for their Pharisaic Passover

Observations on Benedict XVI's Passover Eve Synagogue Visit

Benedict Wants the World to be Conscious of the Symbolic Significance of his Passover Eve Synagogue Visit

Man with history as federal government informant jailed in fatal shooting of 3 Christians in claimed 'anti-Jewish Hate Crime'

Friday, April 11, 2014

Bp. Williamson and The Midrash "of the Man God"

"… if I had a family to defend: [I would read] aloud each night to the children selected chapters from Maria Valtorta’s Poem of the Man-God. And when we had reached the end of the five volumes in English, I imagine us starting again from the beginning, and so on, until all the children had left home!" (Bp. Williamson, Eleison Comments  CCLXXV (275) 20 October 2012. HOME READING)

I've been asked to collate research I've done on the 'Catholic' Midrash titled The Poem of the Man God allegedly written by a woman named Maria Valtorta which is heavily promoted by Bp. Williamson. Most of this was posted at a traditionalist forum which was taken offline making it inaccessible. Below are some comments based upon that research which I posted at another traditionalist forum which doesn't include all my objections, most notably that "the Poem" depicts a Mary who reasons that she should be "a big sinner" so that she could repent later. This is barely veiled Lurianic theology which one might expect to find in a Frankist sect.

Below starts my comments and some dialogue which came in response to one of Bp. Williamson's published recommendations for children to be read The Poem of the Man God :


Below is a link to a recording of a talk given by Fr. Robinson (SSPX) promoting "The Poem." What interested me most is that Fr. Robinson says that his initial reaction to "The Poem" was negative but that Bp. Williamson insisted that he continue reading it.

Sadly, he states that Bp. Williamson stakes his theological reputation on "The Poem" being free from error. He says that Bp. Williamson has stated he would ordain any man to the priesthood who reads "The Poem" because he believes it contains an entire seminary curriculum within it (something I find unsettling in light of Bp. Williamson's recent statement about making his bishop's powers available "to anyone who will use them wisely").

Fr. Robinson has said that he has looked at every objection to "The Poem" but he nor any of "the Poem's" apologists have answered to its outrageous depiction of Christ venerating the Pharisee and father of rabbinic Judaism, Hillel; just as The Angelus administration never answered for the similar outrage in "Saint of the Sanhedrin."

This is where Bp. Williamson sadly walks in lockstep with the "Saint of the Sanhedrin" agenda.

"The Poem" or more accurately, the Midrash "of the Man-God," like "The Saint of the Sanhedrin" extols the virtue of the Pharisee Hillel, outrageously putting Jesus on his knees venerating Hillel's grave, among many other absurdities.

Quote "Jesus" as depicted in The Poem of the Man God:
"I love and venerate Hillel, I respect and honour Gamaliel. They are two men through whose justice and wisdom the origin of man is revealed"

Who in their right mind cannot see the pharisaic/rabbinic hand behind this outrageous Pharisee-veneration put in the mouth of Christ?

There is no justice in the Pharisee Hillel. A book that claims that Jesus venerated the Pharisee Hillel who overruled God's law on divorce and allowed divorce for any reason; who nullified God's 7 year release of debts and created loopholes for incest by defining it as "not sex" is absolutely, 100% certainly not from God.

"The Poem" was shepherded past Cardinal Ottaviani and the Holy Office by Cardinal Bea of unhappy memory whose treachery reached its zenith with the shepherding of Nostra Aetate through Vatican II.

At least Bp. Williamson admits that he recommends this Pharisee-venerating tome against the will of Archbishop Lefebvre although he minimizes the Archbishop's objections to it, and the objections of others.

To understand why it's impossible that Jesus would venerate the creature Hillel for "justice and wisdom" we look at Mark 10;2-10 and Matthew 19;3-9 in which the Pharisees attempt to ensnare Jesus on the topic of divorce.

Judaic and Christian scholarship of any given era largely takes for granted that Jesus is being confronted with the pharisaic positions of Hillel and Shammai in this passage. The Gospel passage makes it clear that Jesus condemns both the positions of Hillel and Shammai, corrects the injustices of both positions and teaches what God intends on the indissolubility of marriage.

The 1917 Catholic Encyclopedia identifies Hillel and his "lax" teaching on divorce with the Gospel narrative of the Pharisaic attempted ensnarement of Jesus on that topic:

In the time of Christ there was an acute controversy between the recent, lax school of Hillel and the strict, conservative school of Schammai about the meaning of the Hebrew phrase ["for some uncleanness"]. Hence the question with which the Pharisees tempted Our Lord: "Is it lawful [for a man to put away his wife] for every cause?" The putting-away of the wife for frivolous reasons had been sharply condemned by God through the Prophets Micheas (ii, 9) and Malachias (ii, 14), but in later days it became very prevalent. (Catholic Encyclopedia, "Divorce")

We know from the Gospel that Jesus condemned Hillel's unjust teaching on divorce. We know with absolute certainty that the Gospel is of God. If the law of non-contradiction has any bearing on the matter, the Midrash "of the Man-God" which outrageously depicts Jesus venerating the creature Hillel for his "justice and wisdom" cannot be of God.

It may interest people to know that the shepherd of the Midrash "of the Man God," Augustin Bea wrote the draft for the encyclical Divino Afflante Spiritu which opened the Bible to textual and historical criticism within the Church. This same Augustin Bea abused every means to assure that the error-strewn Midrash "of the Man God" suffered no criticism at all.

Single-issue traditionalists who don't care about Augustine Bea's shepherding of the Midrash "of the Man God" past any criticism or his shepherding of Nostra Aetate through Vatican II or his shepherding of textual and historical criticism of Scripture into the Church may be interested to know of his role in shepherding the Novus Ordo Mass into Catholic parishes. Augustin Bea, along with Annibale Bugnini and others, was a member of the secretive Commission for Liturgical Reform from its very beginning in 1948. As we know, the first target of attack was the Holy Week liturgy.

There is a clear trajectory to his treachery for anyone with eyes to see. The Judaizing "Poem of the Man God" is very much in alignment with it.

Telesphorus said:
It will be very good to have Bishop Williamson in the resistance.

We can only pray that Bishops Tissier and Alphonso will join it, so that there is no question as to which side is carrying the legacy of the Archbishop.

Catholic Tradition needs new leaders, new consecrations.

With the children being led to believe that Jesus venerated Hillel, among too many other absurdities to list, there will be no resistance worth speaking of.

Telesphorus said:

How could a just man argue that a husband could put his away wife for spoiling supper, as the Pharisee Hillel taught?

It is maddening that the modernists have tried to cast Our Lord as a follower of Hillel.  And worse that the ignorant or insane editors of the Angelus would attempt to place him between Isaiah and John the Baptist.  Hillel does not appear in Holy Writ.  Hillel is not a figure in salvation history.  St. Paul asserted plainly that his pharisaic training was useless.

Indeed. And how can Bp. Williamson not only promote a work that goes far beyond "Saint of the Sanhedrin" in its outrages and claim that this work is of God?

This is far, far worse than The Angelus article which does not go so far as to make Jesus venerate Hillel or claim an imprimatur from heaven.

Seraphim said:

  But again, someone reading your great posts could be led to believe that you are accusing Bishop Williamson of Judaizing, whereas I think he is really just (imprudently) recommending a book for other literary qualities.


The Bp. makes no such distinction. He claims it is from God. Children subjected to "the Poem" are unable to distinguish between the 'literary qualities' of the work and the errors it contains.

I don't know what the Bp.'s intention is here. I know that this work he recommends to the children of the resistance is part of the attack.

"Neil Obstat," the misunderstanding is on your part. I'm referencing not only this most recent endorsement of "The Poem" from Bp. Williamson but all of the countless endorsements of this Midrash that he's made throughout his entire ministry, most of which go much farther than this most recent Eleison Comments.

Bp. Williamson has gone so far as to say that he stakes his theological reputation on "The Poem of the Man God" being entirely free of error. He has said explicitly in another Eleison Comments (CCI May 21, 2001, "Two Repentances") that he believes "The Poem" is from God.

Nadir said:
Those who were giving it high praise, even adulation, at the time were saying things like "but it fills in the gaps" (in Holy Scripture). What gaps did God leave in His book?

What's wrong with reading the Holy Bible as a family? Beats me!

I can only agree. The con-man Augustin Bea sold us something we not only don't need, but is damaging to us.

The rabbinic heirs of Hillel have been rendering their followers completely alien to Scripture for 2000 years with their Midrash, which purports to "fill in the blanks."

The shepherd of "The Poem of the Man God" Cardinal Augustin Bea with Vatican II co-conspirator Rabbi Abraham Heschel who said of Christians, "I want to attack their souls."

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

The Fruits of Francis' 'Merciful' Moral Indifference

Pope Francis feeds the remaining scraps of the Catholic flock not already devoured by the Pharisees to their morally degenerate golems.

Furor at Catholic high school after nun presents Church teaching on homosexuality

This is the fruit of ADL produced Catholic teaching material.

These commissars of the multicultural 'tolerance' fraud will not protect the moral minority, God will, however.

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Alan Shatter Opponents, Stay on Point

The comment below was censored by

A lot can and should be said about the fact that they find a suggestion that protest should be non-violent and point-based too dangerous to publish.

Opponents of Alan Shatter's immigration policy should avoid slurs and pranks and stay on point. Emphasize the fact that he would never advocate the same immigration policy for 'Israel' that he imposes upon Ireland. Emphasize the fact that Shatter will not criticize 'Israel's' racist immigration policy and marriage laws, its sending asylum seekers back to Rwanda, its horrific treatment of all non-Jews, etc. Criticize his unequivocal, hypocritical support for a culturally and ethnically 'pure' 'Jewish' state while acting with complete disregard for the cultural and ethnic makeup of Ireland. Press him with the question, why no multicultural agenda for 'Israel,' Alan Shatter? If this multiculturalism would be such an economic boon for Ireland then why not for 'Israel' also?

Do this without hatred or violence, but firmly with the conviction that the Irish are more entitled to maintain their cultural and ethnic makeup on the land they've inhabited for thousands of years than the Zionists dragging their stolen culture to stolen land in the Middle East who Alan Shatter identifies with and defends more than the country he's supposed to serve.

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Without an 'existential' threat Counterfeit Israel would collapse in one month

This is not an 'apartheid wall' surrounding a 'European colonial expansionist project.' It's a Judaic ghetto wall surrounding a Judaic ghetto.

Very few of the 'secular,' 'Communist' 'Jews' who founded the nation they call 'Israel' were removed from the rabbinic ghettos and shtetls of Europe (which were imposed upon them by the rabbis, with the cooperation of Christian nobility) by even a generation. Counterfeit Israel and its ghetto wall are direct manifestations of the protection racket of rabbinic Judaism. Without real or imaginary 'existential' threats Judaism and its direct, ideological descendant, Zionism fall apart.

Excised from: "The crisis that Israel adroitly manufactured," Kourosh Ziabari, April 2, 2014

The representative of the Jewish minority in Iran’s parliament (Majlis) has recently given an extensive interview to one of Iranian news agencies and discussed his different viewpoints regarding the Israeli regime and the way the Jewish community of Iran see the state that proclaims to be representing the global Jewry.

According to Siamak Mareh Sedq who has talked to the Fars News Agency, Tel Aviv needs to create crisis in the Middle East in order to survive. “If Israel faces no threat it will be destroyed within one month. Israel needs (regional) crises in a bid to continue its existence,” he said.

This wise and precise analysis is exactly what the audacious commentators, intellectuals and journalists in the West who dare to criticize the policies and practices of the Israeli regime without fear of losing their jobs or being vilified as “anti-Semites” agree on. This is something that even the Israelis know well and confess to. An anonymous Israeli official once had privately told the president of the National Iranian American Council Trita Parsi, “You have to recognize that we Israelis need an existential threat. It is part of the way we view the world. If we can find more than one, that would be preferable, but we will settle for one.”

The fact that Israel needs a serious existential threat to secure its survival and depends on regional crises to make sure that its existence will not be undermined and can go ahead with its colonial, expansionistic projects and ambitions is no closed book to anyone studying the history of this regime.

Mormons are 'Noahides'

Observant Mormons certainly fall into the category of Bnei Noach, and can relate in a religious way to the respect and reverence that observant Jews have for this great prophet [Noah]. ("Why Russell Crowe Should Play a Mormon Noah," Mormon 'Bishop' Mark Paredes, Jewish Journal, March 31, 2014)

Joseph Smith, founder of Mormonism, was a Freemason who was killed by porch Masons who were angered by his coopting and revising masonic ritual and tradition for his new religion. The rabbis have little to dislike about 'Noahide' Mormonism.

Second Anti-Catholic 'Price Tag' Attack in Counterfeit Israel This Week

Don't let anyone tell you this is hooliganism. This (and much, much worse) is the method of terror that Khazar fanatics used to drive native Palestinian Christians and Muslims off their land so that Counterfeit Israel could be propped up there. The religious ideology-fueled terrorist savagery has been ongoing since.

Large-Scale Anti-Christian Price Tag Attack In Northen Israel

Shmarya Rosenberg •

The tires of 40 vehicles were slashed and a wall was spray painted with a message reading “only goyim should be evacuated from our land" Wednesday night or early Thursday morning in Jish, a small Arab village with about 3,000 residents located near Sefat in the Upper Galilee, Ynet reported.

Police reportedly believe the incident is another in a long line of price tag attacks believed to be carried out by Jewish West Bank settler youth and their supporters, almost all of whom are Zionist Orthodox or haredi-Zionist Orthodox.

Jish is the only village in Israel with a majority Maronite-Catholic population. Only one third of Jish’s residents are Muslim …

Earlier this week, anti-American and anti-Christian graffiti – including "America is Nazi Germany,” "price tag,” “Jesus is a monkey,” and “Mary is a cow” – was spray-painted on the Deir Rafat Monastery near Beit Shemesh and the tires of three cars and a truck were slashed.

Last week another price tag attack took place in East Jerusalem. The tires of 34 cars and a bus were slashed, and all the vehicles were spray-painted with "goyim in Israel = enemies.”

No arrests in any of these attacks have been made.

But that is not unusual.

In the many price tag attacks that have taken place over the past several years – including quite a few involving arson and attempted arson – almost no arrests have been made and, despite claims to the contrary, police do not appear to consider apprehending the attackers a high priority.

Full article:

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Francis' Incorrect Diagnosis and Poisonous Prescription writes:

Bergoglio's pre-conclave remarks

The archbishop of Havana, Cardinal Jaime Lucas Ortega y Alamino was so impressed with the remarks Jorge Mario Bergoglio made before the conclave he asked him for a copy of them. Bergoglio gave Ortega a copy of his outline and soon after the conclave Francis gave Ortega permission to share this document publicly. The unofficial translation below is from Radio Vatican, Bergoglio's Intervention: A diagnosis of the problems in the Church. The original story was broken by the official magazine of the diocese of Havana, Palabra Nueva, Manuscrito entregado por el Cardenal Bergoglio al Cardenal Ortega. Images of the handwritten notes are from Palabra Nueva, Imagen del manuscrito entregado por el Cardenal Bergoglio al Cardenal Ortega.

Evangelizing implies Apostolic Zeal

1. - Evangelizing pre-supposes a desire in the Church to come out of herself. The Church is called to come out of herself and to go to the peripheries, not only geographically, but also the existential peripheries: the mystery of sin, of pain, of injustice, of ignorance and indifference to religion, of intellectual currents, and of all misery.

2. - When the Church does not come out of herself to evangelize, she becomes self-referential and then gets sick. (cf. The deformed woman of the Gospel). The evils that, over time, happen in ecclesial institutions have their root in self-referentiality and a kind of theological narcissism. In Revelation, Jesus says that he is at the door and knocks. Obviously, the text refers to his knocking from the outside in order to enter but I think about the times in which Jesus knocks from within so that we will let him come out. The self-referential Church keeps Jesus Christ within herself and does not let him out.

3. - When the Church is self-referential, inadvertently, she believes she has her own light; she ceases to be the mysterium lunae and gives way to that very serious evil, spiritual worldliness (which according to De Lubac, is the worst evil that can befall the Church). It lives to give glory only to one another.

Put simply, there are two images of the Church: Church which evangelizes and comes out of herself, the Dei Verbum religiose audiens et fidente proclamans; and the worldly Church, living within herself, of herself, for herself. This should shed light on the possible changes and reforms which must be done for the salvation of souls.

4. - Thinking of the next Pope: He must be a man who, from the contemplation and adoration of Jesus Christ, helps the Church to go out to the existential peripheries, that helps her to be the fruitful mother, who gains life from “the sweet and comforting joy of evangelizing.”

It would be a mistake for any traditionalist to conclude from these jottings that Francis intends only to cut the Church off from its mooring by his attack on self-referentiality (i.e. reference to the Church's foundational texts and teachings). No, based upon the evidence, Francis' 'madness' has a very clear, traceable trajectory. The intent is certainly not to let the Church blow any which way, but rather, to tie it to a counterfeit mooring.

Pope Francis' euphemistic language above has been translated to English. I will endeavor to translate it from euphemism to plainspeak below:

1.  We Pharisees hate true Gospel evangelization, therefore we tell the Goy Catholics that to evangelize, the Church "must come out of itself." This statement implies a problem of shameful, sick Church ghettoization which must be remedied by 'coming out.' This is one way that we attack the integrity of Christian community and its evangelism. Simultaneously, we build higher the walls of the Judaic ghettos, from Brooklyn to [Counterfeit] Israel, and come out only for the purpose of moneymaking, buying off Goy representatives, hijacking Goy institutions, evangelizing our self-referential 'Noahide laws' and otherwise disrupting Goy community.

2. We self-refer to Talmud and Kabbalah but we forbid the Goy Catholics from any reference point of their own; only those supplied by us, primarily 'The Holocaust,' are permitted. 'Holocaust' referentiality is how we make the Church sick with shame and guilt. The 'Holocaust' referential Church is sick with shame of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (which we say caused 'The Holocaust'), keeps it hidden under a bushel and doesn't evangelize as the Gospel illustrates.

3. The Gospel (and doctrines and teachings derived from it) is the light which the Church has referred to and believed, to varying degrees, for 2000 years. When the Church is loosed from its Gospel foundation it gives way to that very serious evil, apostasy, which Christ and the Apostles most strenuously warned against. We replace this foundation with a crude counterfeit composite of De Lubac and 'The Holocaust,' etc. A Holocaust-referential Church gives glory to 'The Jews' and their myriad tales of suffering.

Put simply, there are two images of the Church, one which 'comes out' destroying the integrity of its teachings and community, an empty shell, good only for Noahide/Holocaust evangelization, in contrast to a Church which refers to Jesus Christ, His Gospel and His doctrines, teachings and sacraments, maintaining a strong Christ-referential community, evangelizing by welcoming others into the community of true Israel as equal members. The latter is threatening to our race-based, two-tiered Pharisaic ghetto protection racket and must be destroyed.

4. The next Pope must be a man who continues the work of drawing Pharisee-referential Noahidism and Holocaustolatry into the Church transforming it into an evangelical medium for we Pharisees. I, Jorge Bergoglio, humbly submit that I am the man for the job.

Also see:

The Pope's Bad Advice

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Moderate Orthodox Judaic Blasphemies Again Spray-Painted on Convent Wall

“This is not the first time there have been attacks on Christian places of worship and until now we’ve not heard of the trial of anyone involved,” [Archbishop Fouad Twal] told AFP at the scene.

If the 'Jews' allegedly behind this attack are extremists as reported by the press, then more so are the highest authorities of rabbinic Judaism whose codified writings blaspheme Jesus as a sexually depraved magician and his mother as a whore hairdresser among other such imbecilities. To call Jesus a monkey and his Mother a cow is arguably less offensive and 'extreme' than the blasphemies codified in the 'holy' texts of Orthodox Judaism. Moreover, slashing the tires of these nuns is nothing compared to the violence and killing permitted and indeed commanded by rabbinic Judaism to be meted out to 'Gentile' 'idolators' if it's determined that no appreciable backlash will result. In true context these would be the deeds of moderate adherents of Orthodox Judaism.

Extremist Jews Vandalize Israeli Catholic Convent in Price Tag Outrage

Graffiti Blasts Christians and U.S.-Led Peace Talks

JTA - April 01, 2014.

A Catholic monastery near Beit Shemesh was vandalized with anti-American and anti-Christian epithets. 
“America is Nazi Germany” and “Price Tag — Peace Agreement,” as well as “Jesus is a monkey” and “Mary is a cow,” were spray painted on the walls of the monastery. The tires of four vehicles also were slashed. 
The monastery is located in Deir a-Rafat village located close to Kibbutz Tzora near Beit Shemesh 
The vandalism was discovered by monks on Tuesday morning; Jerusalem police are investigating. 
Price tag refers to the strategy adopted by extremist settlers and their supporters generally to exact retribution for settlement freezes and demolitions or Palestinian attacks on Jews.
Other monasteries in the area have been victims of suspected price tag attacks in the past.